ArticleScientific reports2019
Decoupling a tandem-repeat protein: Impact of multiple loop insertions on a modular scaffold.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tandem-repeat proteins introduce tuneable properties to engineered biomolecular condensates.Chemical science · 2025Article
- Discovery and Analysis of Repeat and Low-Complexity Architectures in Proteins and Their Conserved Evolutionary Relationships Using Self-Homology Dot Plots.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Article
- Unraveling the Mechanics of a Repeat-Protein Nanospring: From Folding of Individual Repeats to Fluctuations of the Superhelix.ACS nano · 2022Article
- Testing the length limit of loop grafting in a helical repeat protein.Current research in structural biology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The simple topology and modular architecture of tandem-repeat proteins such as tetratricopeptide repeats (TPRs) and ankyrin repeats makes them straightforward to dissect and redesign. Repeat-protein stability can be manipulated in a predictable way using site-specific mutations. Here we explore a different type of modification - loop insertion - that will enable a simple route to functionalisation of this versatile scaffold. We previously showed that a single loop insertion has a dramatically different effect on stability depending on its location in the repeat array. Here we dissect this effect by a combination of multiple and alternated loop insertions to understand the origins of the context-dependent loss in stability. We find that the scaffold is remarkably robust in that its overall structure is maintained. However, adjacent repeats are now only weakly coupled, and consequently the increase in solvent protection, and thus stability, with increasing repeat number that defines the tandem-repeat protein class is lost. Our results also provide us with a rulebook with which we can apply these principles to the design of artificial repeat proteins with precisely tuned folding landscapes and functional capabilities, thereby paving the way for their exploitation as a versatile and truly modular platform in synthetic biology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.