Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31658773›Full record

ArticleViruses2019

Virus Adaptation and Selection Following Challenge of Animals Vaccinated against Classical Swine Fever Virus.

Ulrik Fahnøe, Anders Gorm Pedersen, Camille Melissa Johnston, Richard J Orton, Dirk Höper, Martin Beer, Jens Bukh, Graham J Belsham, Thomas Bruun Rasmussen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ulrik FahnøeNational Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lindholm, DK-4771 Kalvehave, Denmark. ulrik@sund.ku.dk.
Anders Gorm PedersenDepartment of Health Technology, Section for Bioinformatics, Technical University of Denmark, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark. agpe@dtu.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-9650-8965
Camille Melissa JohnstonNational Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lindholm, DK-4771 Kalvehave, Denmark. camille.johnston89@gmail.com.
Richard J OrtonInstitute of Biodiversity, Animal Health, and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK. richard.orton@glasgow.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-3389-4325
Dirk HöperInstitute of Diagnostic Virology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, 17493 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany. dirk.hoeper@fli.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8408-2274
Martin BeerInstitute of Diagnostic Virology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, 17493 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany. martin.beer@fli.de.
Jens BukhCopenhagen Hepatitis C Program (CO-HEP), Department of Infectious Diseases, Hvidovre Hospital and Department of Immunology and Microbiology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, DK-2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark. jbukh@sund.ku.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-7815-4806
Graham J BelshamNational Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lindholm, DK-4771 Kalvehave, Denmark. grbe@sund.ku.dk.ORCID 0000-0003-1187-4873
Thomas Bruun RasmussenNational Veterinary Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lindholm, DK-4771 Kalvehave, Denmark. tbru@ssi.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-4241-1559
Technical University of Denmark · DKFriedrich-Loeffler-Institut · DEUniversity of Copenhagen · DKMRC University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_12014/12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vaccines against classical swine fever have proven very effective in protecting pigs from this deadly disease. However, little is known about how vaccination impacts the selective pressures acting on the classical swine fever virus (CSFV). Here we use high-throughput sequencing of viral genomes to investigate evolutionary changes in virus populations following the challenge of naïve and vaccinated pigs with the highly virulent CSFV strain "Koslov". The challenge inoculum contained an ensemble of closely related viral sequences, with three major haplotypes being present, termed A, B, and C. After the challenge, the viral haplotype A was preferentially located within the tonsils of naïve animals but was highly prevalent in the sera of all vaccinated animals. We find that the viral population structure in naïve pigs after infection is very similar to that in the original inoculum. In contrast, the viral population in vaccinated pigs, which only underwent transient low-level viremia, displayed several distinct changes including the emergence of 16 unique non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that were not detectable in the challenge inoculum. Further analysis showed a significant loss of heterogeneity and an increasing positive selection acting on the virus populations in the vaccinated pigs. We conclude that vaccination imposes a strong selective pressure on viruses that subsequently replicate within the vaccinated animal.

Indexed as

Classical Swine Fever VirusViral InterferenceViral VaccinesAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsBloodClassical Swine FeverHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPalatine TonsilPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRNA, ViralSwineSwine DiseasesVaccinationVaccines, AttenuatedViremiaRNA, ViralVaccines, AttenuatedViral Vaccinesclassical swine fever virusCSFVdeep sequencinghaplotype selectionvaccinationviral populationsvirulencevirus evolution

Identifiers

PMID31658773
PMCPMC6833067
OpenAlexW2979429745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.