Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31658718›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2019

Ecophysiology of

Lenka Procházková, Daniel Remias, Tomáš Řezanka, Linda Nedbalová

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ecological interactions in glacier environments: a review of studies on a model Alpine glacier.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Marine drugs · 2022
    Article
  12. Journal of applied phycology · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Snow and Glacial Algae: A ReviewJournal of phycology · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Cysts of the Snow AlgaFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lenka ProcházkováDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 12844 Prague, Czech Republic. lenkacerven@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3995-6483
Daniel RemiasSchool of Engineering, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Stelzhamerstr. 23, 4600 Wels, Austria. Daniel.Remias@fh-wels.at.ORCID 0000-0003-0896-435X
Tomáš ŘezankaThe Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic. rezanka@biomed.cas.cz.
Linda NedbalováDepartment of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, 12844 Prague, Czech Republic. lindane@natur.cuni.cz.ORCID 0000-0003-1800-714X
Charles University · CZCzech Academy of Sciences · CZUniversity of Applied Sciences Upper Austria · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 29959the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) P29959the Czech Science Foundation (GACR) 17-00027Sthe Czech Science Foundation (GAČR) 18-02634S
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Slowly melting snowfields in mountain and polar regions are habitats of snow algae. Orange blooms were sampled in three European mountain ranges. The cysts within the blooms morphologically resembled those of

Indexed as

astaxanthincryofloracystsenvironmental samplefatty acidsphotosynthesis

Identifiers

PMID31658718
PMCPMC6843554
OpenAlexW2979762393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.