ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2019
Comparing the Osteogenic Potentials and Bone Regeneration Capacities of Bone Marrow and Dental Pulp Mesenchymal Stem Cells in a Rabbit Calvarial Bone Defect Model.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 117 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
117 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 278 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic potential of dental mesenchymal stem cells versus mesenchymal stem cells from other sources: a systematic review of animal studies.BMC oral health · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluating the efficacy of human dental pulp stem cells and scaffold combination for bone regeneration in animal models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2023Pooled it
- Nanomaterials Modulating the Fate of Dental-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Involved in Oral Tissue Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.International journal of nanomedicine · 2023Pooled it
- Dental Pulp Stem Cells for Modelling Osteoarthritis.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Article
- Effects of photobiomodulation on human dental pulp stem cells treated with a bone xenograft: An in vitro study.Lasers in medical science · 2026Article
- Advancements in bone organoids: perspectives on construction methodologies and application strategies.Journal of advanced research · 2026Review
- Bone Tissue Bioengineering for Craniofacial and Dental Applications: Association of Deciduous Dental Pulp Stem Cells to Carbonated Hydroxyapatite.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Osteogenic Potential of 3D Bioprinted Collagen Scaffolds Enriched with Bone Marrow Stromal Cells, BMP-2, and Hydroxyapatite in a Rabbit Calvarial Defect Model.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Direct Pulp Capping of Dental Pulp with Two Different Autologous Platelet Concentrates A-PRF+ and H-PRF-A Report on Two Cases.Dentistry journal · 2026Article
- Enhanced Bone Regeneration by Scaffold-Free Three-Dimensional Constructs of Human Dental Pulp Stem Cells in a Rat Mandibular Defect Model.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Qi-Gui-Jian-Gu Decoction Accelerates Osteogenesis and Fracture Healing by Activating the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway.Current computer-aided drug design · 2026Article
- Human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells/Bio-Oss granules composite prevents medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw in a rat model.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Magnesium-doped bioactive glass enhances bone regeneration by reversing replicative senescence of human dental pulp stem cells in bone defect therapy.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- Low Expression of Selenoprotein S Promotes Osteogenic Differentiation in Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells.Biological trace element research · 2025Article
- Bone Regeneration in Rat Calvaria Using 3D-Printed Scaffolds with Graded Porosity and In Vitro Degradation.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Neural crest-derived mesenchymal stem cells: Fates and perspectives.World journal of stem cells · 2025Review
- SUV39H1 facilitate the osteogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells by modulating lipid metabolism and mitochondrial dynamics through FASN via non-histone methylation and ubiquitination mechanism.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Article
- LncRNA TP53TG1 promotes the growth and osteo/dentinogenic differentiation of dental pulp stem cells by activating the Smad3 and JNK1/2 pathway.In vitro cellular & developmental biology. Animal · 2025Article
- Assessing bone regeneration potential of 3D scaffold-free cell pellets from periodontal ligament and bone marrow stem cells.BMC biotechnology · 2025Article
- Therapeutic effect of mesenchymal stem cells and their derived exosomes in diseases.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Review
57 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The bone regeneration efficiency of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and dental pulp mesenchymal stem cells (DPSCs) combined with xenografts in the craniofacial region remains unclear. Accordingly, this study commenced by comparing the cell morphology, cell proliferation, trilineage differentiation, mineral synthesis, and osteogenic gene expression of BMSCs and DPSCs in vitro. Four experimental groups (empty control, Bio-Oss only, Bio-Oss+BMSCs, and Bio-Oss+DPSCs) were then designed and implanted in rabbit calvarial defects. The BMSCs and DPSCs showed a similar morphology, proliferative ability, surface marker profile, and trilineage-differentiation potential in vitro. However, the BMSCs exhibited a higher mineral deposition and expression levels of osteogenic marker genes, including alkaline phosphatase (ALP), runt related transcription factor 2 (RUNX2), and osteocalcin (OCN). In the in vivo studies, the bone volume density in both MSC groups was significantly greater than that in the empty control or Bio-Oss only group. Moreover, the new bone formation and Collagen I / osteoprotegerin protein expressions of the scaffold+MSC groups were higher than those of the Bio-Oss only group. Finally, the Bio-Oss+BMSC and Bio-Oss+DPSC groups had a similar bone mineral density, new bone formation, and osteogenesis-related protein expression. Overall, the DPSCs seeded on Bio-Oss matched the bone regeneration efficacy of BMSCs in vivo and hence appear to be a promising strategy for craniofacial defect repair in future clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.