Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31658673›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2019

Comparison of Different Invasive and Non-Invasive Methods to Characterize Intestinal Microbiota throughout a Production Cycle of Broiler Chickens.

Jannigje G Kers, Egil A J Fischer, J Arjan Stegeman, Hauke Smidt, Francisca C Velkers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jannigje G KersFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Farm Animal Health, Utrecht University, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands. j.g.kers@uu.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-9951-7549
Egil A J FischerFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Farm Animal Health, Utrecht University, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands. e.a.j.fischer@uu.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-0599-701X
J Arjan StegemanFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Farm Animal Health, Utrecht University, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands. j.a.stegeman@uu.nl.
Hauke SmidtLaboratory of Microbiology, Wageningen University & Research, 6708 WE Wageningen, The Netherlands. Hauke.Smidt@wur.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-6138-5026
Francisca C VelkersFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Farm Animal Health, Utrecht University, 3584 CL Utrecht, The Netherlands. f.c.velkers@uu.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-2923-3233

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the short life of broiler chickens, their intestinal microbiota undergoes many changes. To study underlying biological mechanisms and factors that influence the intestinal microbiota development, longitudinal data from flocks and individual birds is needed. However, post-mortem collection of samples hampers longitudinal data collection. In this study, invasively collected cecal and ileal content, cloacal swabs collected from the same bird, and boot sock samples and cecal droppings from the litter of the broilers' poultry house, were collected on days 0, 2, 7, 14 and 35 post-hatch. The different sample types were evaluated on their applicability and reliability to characterize the broiler intestinal microbiota. The microbiota of 247 samples was assessed by 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon sequencing. Analyses of α and β measures showed a similar development of microbiota composition of cecal droppings compared to cecal content. Furthermore, the composition of cecal content samples was comparable to that of the boot socks until day 14 post-hatch. This study shows that the value of non-invasive sample types varies at different ages and depends on the goal of the microbiota characterization. Specifically, cecal droppings and boot socks may be useful alternatives for cecal samples to determine intestinal microbiota composition longitudinally.

Indexed as

16S rRNAaviangutmethodsmicrobiomepoultry

Identifiers

PMID31658673
PMCPMC6843853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.