Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31658371›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2020

Macronutrients modulate survival to infection and immunity in Drosophila.

Fleur Ponton, Juliano Morimoto, Katie Robinson, Sheemal S Kumar, Sheena C Cotter, Kenneth Wilson, Stephen J Simpson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Infection and immunity · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. The immunology of sickness metabolism.Cellular & molecular immunology · 2024
    Review
  9. Evolution of innate immunity: lessons from mammalian models shaping our current view of insect immunity.Journal of comparative physiology. B, Biochemical, systemic, and environmental physiology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Infection burdens and virulence under heat stress: ecological and evolutionary considerations.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Metabolic and immunological responses ofEcology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Fleur PontonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7156-3896
Juliano MorimotoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3561-1920
Katie RobinsonCharles Perkins Centre and School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sheemal S KumarDepartment of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sheena C CotterSchool of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3801-8316
Kenneth WilsonLancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5264-6522
Stephen J SimpsonCharles Perkins Centre and School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0256-7687

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunity and nutrition are two essential modulators of individual fitness. However, while the implications of immune function and nutrition on an individual's lifespan and reproduction are well established, the interplay between feeding behaviour, infection and immune function remains poorly understood. Asking how ecological and physiological factors affect immune responses and resistance to infections is a central theme of eco-immunology. In this study, we used the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, to investigate how infection through septic injury modulates nutritional intake and how macronutrient balance affects survival to infection by the pathogenic Gram-positive bacterium Micrococcus luteus. Our results show that infected flies maintain carbohydrate intake, but reduce protein intake, thereby shifting from a protein-to-carbohydrate (P:C) ratio of ~1:4 to ~1:10 relative to non-infected and sham-infected flies. Strikingly, the proportion of flies dying after M. luteus infection was significantly lower when flies were fed a low-P high-C diet, revealing that flies shift their macronutrient intake as means of nutritional self-medication against bacterial infection. These results are likely due to the effects of the macronutrient balance on the regulation of the constitutive expression of innate immune genes, as a low-P high-C diet was linked to an upregulation in the expression of key antimicrobial peptides. Together, our results reveal the intricate relationship between macronutrient intake and resistance to infection and integrate the molecular cross-talk between metabolic and immune pathways into the framework of nutritional immunology.

Indexed as

DrosophilaInfectionsAnimalsDietDrosophila melanogasterImmunity, InnateNutrientsNutrientsDrosophilaimmunityinfectionmacronutrientsnutrition

Identifiers

PMID31658371
PMCPMC7027473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.