Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31658273›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Measurable residual disease monitoring for patients with acute myeloid leukemia following hematopoietic cell transplantation using error corrected hybrid capture next generation sequencing.

Vidya Balagopal, Andrew Hantel, Sabah Kadri, George Steinhardt, Chao Jie Zhen, Wenjun Kang, Pankhuri Wanjari, Lauren L Ritterhouse, Wendy Stock, Jeremy P Segal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Vidya BalagopalDepartment of Pathology, Division of Genomic and Molecular Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8630-7414
Andrew HantelDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Sabah KadriDepartment of Pathology, Division of Genomic and Molecular Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
George SteinhardtDepartment of Pathology, Division of Genomic and Molecular Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Chao Jie ZhenDepartment of Pathology, Division of Genomic and Molecular Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Wenjun KangCenter for Research Informatics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Pankhuri WanjariDepartment of Pathology, Division of Genomic and Molecular Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Lauren L RitterhouseDepartment of Pathology, Division of Genomic and Molecular Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Wendy StockDepartment of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.
Jeremy P SegalDepartment of Pathology, Division of Genomic and Molecular Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improved systems for detection of measurable residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are urgently needed, however attempts to utilize broad-scale next-generation sequencing (NGS) panels to perform multi-gene surveillance in AML post-induction have been stymied by persistent premalignant mutation-bearing clones. We hypothesized that this technology may be more suitable for evaluation of fully engrafted patients following hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). To address this question, we developed a hybrid-capture NGS panel utilizing unique molecular identifiers (UMIs) to detect variants at 0.1% VAF or below across 22 genes frequently mutated in myeloid disorders and applied it to a retrospective sample set of blood and bone marrow DNA samples previously evaluated as negative for disease via standard-of-care short tandem repeat (STR)-based engraftment testing and hematopathology analysis in our laboratory. Of 30 patients who demonstrated trackable mutations in the 22 genes at eventual relapse by standard NGS analysis, we were able to definitively detect relapse-associated mutations in 18/30 (60%) at previously disease-negative timepoints collected 20-100 days prior to relapse date. MRD was detected in both bone marrow (15/28, 53.6%) and peripheral blood samples (9/18, 50%), while showing excellent technical specificity in our sample set. We also confirmed the disappearance of all MRD signal with increasing time prior to relapse (>100 days), indicating true clinical specificity, even using genes commonly associated with clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential (CHIP). This study highlights the efficacy of a highly sensitive, NGS panel-based approach to early detection of relapse in AML and supports the clinical validity of extending MRD analysis across many genes in the post-transplant setting.

Indexed as

MutationAdultAgedFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsMiddle AgedNeoplasm, ResidualRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySequence Analysis, DNAYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31658273
PMCPMC6816574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.