Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31658272›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

True Colors: Commercially-acquired morphological genotypes reveal hidden allele variation among dog breeds, informing both trait ancestry and breed potential.

Dayna L Dreger, Blair N Hooser, Angela M Hughes, Balasubramanian Ganesan, Jonas Donner, Heidi Anderson, Lauren Holtvoigt, Kari J Ekenstedt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Genomic analyses identify 15 risk loci and revealProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. The Shepherd and the Hunter: A Genomic Comparison of Italian Dog Breeds.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Veterinary sciences · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Analysis ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. A ThirdGenes · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Dayna L DregerDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3218-6431
Blair N HooserDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5897-9042
Angela M HughesWisdom Health, Vancouver, WA, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1035-5238
Balasubramanian GanesanWisdom Health, Vancouver, WA, United States of America.
Jonas DonnerWisdom Health, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-9874-8484
Heidi AndersonWisdom Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Lauren HoltvoigtWisdom Health, Vancouver, WA, United States of America.
Kari J EkenstedtDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, United States of America.

Funding

Novel Genetic Models for Vertebral AbnormalitiesK01OD027051 · OD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI EKENSTEDT, KARI J · 2019 to 2023
$627k
NIH HHS K01 OD027051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct-to-consumer canine genetic testing is becoming increasingly popular among dog owners. The data collected therein provides intriguing insight into the current status of morphological variation present within purebred populations. Mars WISDOM PANELTM data from 11,790 anonymized dogs, representing 212 breeds and 4 wild canine species, were evaluated at genes associated with 7 coat color traits and 5 physical characteristics. Frequencies for all tested alleles at these 12 genes were determined by breed and by phylogenetic grouping. A sub-set of the data, consisting of 30 breeds, was divided into separate same-breed populations based on country of collection, body size, coat variation, or lineages selected for working or conformation traits. Significantly different (p ≤ 0.00167) allele frequencies were observed between populations for at least one of the tested genes in 26 of the 30 breeds. Next, standard breed descriptions from major American and international registries were used to determine colors and tail lengths (e.g. genetic bobtail) accepted within each breed. Alleles capable of producing traits incongruous with breed descriptions were observed in 143 breeds, such that random mating within breeds has probabilities of between 4.9e-7 and 0.25 of creating undesirable phenotypes. Finally, the presence of rare alleles within breeds, such as those for the recessive black coloration and natural bobtail, was combined with previously published identity-by-decent haplotype sharing levels to propose pathways by which the alleles may have spread throughout dog breeds. Taken together, this work demonstrates that: 1) the occurrence of low frequency alleles within breeds can reveal the influence of regional or functional selection practices; 2) it is possible to visualize the potential historic connections between breeds that share rare alleles; and 3) the necessity of addressing conflicting ideals in breed descriptions relative to actual genetic potential is crucial.

Indexed as

Quantitative Trait LociAnimalsBreedingCommerceDirect-To-Consumer Screening and TestingDogsEvolution, MolecularGene FrequencyGenetic TestingGenetic VariationGenotypePhenotypePhylogenySelection, GeneticSkin PigmentationSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID31658272
PMCPMC6816562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.