Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31658264›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

Comparison of four DNA extraction and three preservation protocols for the molecular detection and quantification of soil-transmitted helminths in stool.

Mio Ayana, Piet Cools, Zeleke Mekonnen, Abdissa Biruksew, Daniel Dana, Nour Rashwan, Roger Prichard, Johnny Vlaminck, Jaco J Verweij, Bruno Levecke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Anthelmintic drugs for treating ascariasis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Revision of the GenusInsects · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Assemblages and Subassemblages ofJournal of parasitology research · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A Pilot Comparison of Fixatives for Hookworm Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Mio AyanaSchool of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Piet CoolsDepartment of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Zeleke MekonnenSchool of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Abdissa BiruksewSchool of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Daniel DanaSchool of Medical Laboratory Sciences, Institute of Health, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Nour RashwanInstitute of Parasitology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Roger PrichardInstitute of Parasitology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Johnny VlaminckDepartment of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-3601-9825
Jaco J VerweijLaboratory for Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Bruno LeveckeDepartment of Virology, Parasitology and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8912-5595
Jimma University · ETGhent University · BEMcGill University · CAElisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA DNA extraction and preservation protocol that yields sufficient and qualitative DNA is pivotal for the success of any nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), but it still poses a challenge for soil-transmitted helminths (STHs), including Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura and the two hookworms (Necator americanus and Ancylostoma duodenale). In the present study, we assessed the impact of different DNA extraction and preservativation protocols on STH-specific DNA amplification from stool. METHODOLOGY AND PRINCIPAL

findingsIn a first experiment, DNA was extracted from 37 stool samples with variable egg counts for T. trichiura and N. americanus applying two commercial kits, both with and without a prior bead beating step. The DNA concentration of T. trichiura and N. americanus was estimated by means of qPCR. The results showed clear differences in DNA concentration across both DNA extraction kits, which varied across both STHs. They also indicated that adding a bead beating step substantially improved DNA recovery, particularly when the FECs were high. In a second experiment, 20 stool samples with variable egg counts for A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura and N. americanus were preserved in either 96% ethanol, 5% potassium dichromate or RNAlater and were stored at 4°C for 65, 245 and 425 days. DNA was extracted using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue kit with a bead beating step. Stool samples preserved in ethanol proved to yield higher DNA concentrations as FEC increased, although stool samples appeared to be stable over time in all preservatives.

conclusionsThe choice of DNA extraction kit significantly affects the outcome of NAATs. Given the clear benefit of bead beating and our validation of ethanol for (long-term) preservation, we recommend that these aspects of the protocol should be adopted by any stool sampling and DNA extraction protocol for downstream NAAT-based detection and quantification of STHs.

Indexed as

AdolescentAncylostomaAncylostomatoideaAnimalsAscariasisAscaris lumbricoidesChildChild, PreschoolDNAFecesHelminthiasisHelminthsHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNecator americanusNecatoriasisDNASoil

Identifiers

PMID31658264
PMCPMC6837582
OpenAlexW2982485123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.