ArticlePLoS computational biology2019
Epigenetic switching as a strategy for quick adaptation while attenuating biochemical noise.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Codon bias variation in Staphylococcus aureus.PloS one · 2026Article
- MemorySeq identifies heritable epigenetic phenotypes that initiate cell culture stress tolerance in CHO cells.iScience · 2025Article
- Gene body methylation regulates gene expression and mediates phenotypic diversity in natural Arabidopsis populations.Nature plants · 2025Article
- Advantage of an epigenetic switch in response to alternate environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Evolution of a bistable genetic system in fluctuating and nonfluctuating environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Proteostatic tuning underpins the evolution of novel multicellular traits.Science advances · 2024Article
- Proteostatic tuning underpins the evolution of novel multicellular traits.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Self-empowerment of life through RNA networks, cells and viruses.F1000Research · 2023Review
- What is life?Molecular biology reports · 2021Article
- Scalable control of developmental timetables by epigenetic switching networks.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021Article
- Repeated Exposure of Aspergillus niger Spores to the Antifungal Bacterium Collimonas fungivorans Ter331 Selects for Delayed Spore Germination.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2021Article
- Gene expression noise can promote the fixation of beneficial mutations in fluctuating environments.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Comparative study between discrete and continuum models for the evolution of competing phenotype-structured cell populations in dynamical environments.Physical review. E · 2020Article
- The Molecular Mechanisms of Adaptive Response Related to Environmental Stress.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epigenetic switches are bistable, molecular systems built from self-reinforcing feedback loops that can spontaneously switch between heritable phenotypes in the absence of DNA mutation. It has been hypothesized that epigenetic switches first evolved as a mechanism of bet-hedging and adaptation, but the evolutionary trajectories and conditions by which an epigenetic switch can outcompete adaptation through genetic mutation remain unknown. Here, we used computer simulations to evolve a mechanistic, biophysical model of a self-activating genetic circuit, which can both adapt genetically through mutation and exhibit epigenetic switching. We evolved these genetic circuits under a fluctuating environment that alternatively selected for low and high protein expression levels. In all tested conditions, the population first evolved by genetic mutation towards a region of genotypes where genetic adaptation can occur faster after each environmental transition. Once in this region, the self-activating genetic circuit can exhibit epigenetic switching, which starts competing with genetic adaptation. We show a trade-off between either minimizing the adaptation time or increasing the robustness of the phenotype to biochemical noise. Epigenetic switching was superior in a fast fluctuating environment because it adapted faster than genetic mutation after an environmental transition, while still attenuating the effect of biochemical noise on the phenotype. Conversely, genetic adaptation was favored in a slowly fluctuating environment because it maximized the phenotypic robustness to biochemical noise during the constant environment between transitions, even if this resulted in slower adaptation. This simple trade-off predicts the conditions and trajectories under which an epigenetic switch evolved to outcompete genetic adaptation, shedding light on possible mechanisms by which bet-hedging strategies might emerge and persist in natural populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.