ArticleChinese medical journal2019
A quantitative biomechanical study of positive buttress techniques for femoral neck fractures: a finite element analysis.
Article in Chinese medical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Outcome and Biomechanical Analysis of Dynamic Hip Screw Combined with Derotation Screw in Treating Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures Based on Different Reduction Qualities in Young Patients (≤65 Years of Age).BioMed research international · 2022Trial
- An Adams' Arch -based anatomical classification system guiding internal fixation strategies for non-displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients: a finite element analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- The intertrochanteric line approach for irreducible femoral neck fractures: a novel open reduction technique with favorable clinical outcomes.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- FNS as a more satisfactory surgical option for young and middle-aged patients with femoral neck fractures.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Breaking the treatment dilemma of Schatzker IV fractures: finite element analysis validates hybrid single-plate with tension screw fixation for synergistic optimization of stability and minimally invasive outcomes.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Biomechanical effects of FNS on femoral neck fractures based on different reduction quality: finite element analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Nonanatomical reduction of femoral neck fractures in young patients with different Pauwels classifications: a retrospective study and finite element analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Positive buttress reduction in femoral neck fractures: a literature review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Review
- Article
- Biomechanical investigation of positive reduction in the femoral neck fracture: a finite element analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Biomechanical study of femoral neck system for young patients with nonanatomically reduced femoral neck fractures: a finite element.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Article
- Effect of a Traction Exercise Neck Brace on Cervical Spondylopathy Radiculopathy: A Clinical Study and Finite Element Analysis.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Article
- Nonanatomical Reduction of Femoral Neck Fractures in Young Patients (≤65 Years Old) with Internal Fixation Using Three Parallel Cannulated Screws.BioMed research international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRefractory femoral neck fractures cannot be anatomically reduced by closed traction reduction which may affect fracture healing. We evaluated the biomechanical effects of positive, negative, and anatomic reduction of various degrees of displacement in Pauwels I femoral neck fractures by a finite element analysis.
methodsFive reduction models of Pauwels type I femoral neck fracture were established using the Mimics 17.0 (Materialize, Leuven, Belgia) and Hypermesh 12.0 (Altair Engineering, Troy, MI, USA). According to the degree of fracture displacement, there were three models of positive support, an anatomic reduction model, and a negative 2 mm reduction model. Finite element analysis was conducted using the ABAQUS 6.9 software (Simulia, Suresnes, France). The von Mises stress distribution and the stress peak of internal fixation in different models, the displacement between fracture blocks, and the principal strain of the femoral neck cancellous bone model were recorded under the axial stress of 2100 N.
resultsThe peak von Mises stress on screw of each model was located at the thread of the screw tip. The peak von Mises stress was the lowest at the tip of the anatomic reduction model screw (261.2 MPa). In the positive 4 mm model, the von Mises stress peak was the highest (916.1 MPa). The anatomic reduction model showed the minimum displacement (0.388 mm) between fracture blocks. The maximum displacement was noted in the positive 4 mm model (0.838 mm). The displacement in the positive 3 mm model (0.721 mm) was smaller than that in the negative 2 mm model (0.786 mm). Among the five models, the strain area of the femoral neck cancellous bone was mainly concentrated around the screw hole, and the area around the screw hole could be easily cut.
conclusionsCompared with negative buttress for femoral neck fracture, positive buttress can provide better biomechanical stability. In Pauwel type I fracture of femoral neck, the range of positive buttress should be controlled below 3 mm as far as possible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.