Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31658113›Full record

Trial reportJournal of addiction medicine

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel, Placebo-controlled Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of a Nicotine Mint Lozenge (2 and 4 mg) in Smoking Cessation.

Dan Xiao, Mitchell Kotler, Jian Kang, Chen Wang

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of addiction medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions for preventing weight gain after smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Nicotine replacement therapy: A friend or foe.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Dan XiaoCenter for Respiratory Diseases, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China (DX, CW), Tobacco Medicine and Tobacco Cessation Center, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China (DX), National Clinical Research Center for Respiratory Diseases, Beijing, China (DX, CW), GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare, Parsippany, NJ (MK), Department of Respiratory Medicine, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China (JK), Institute of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China (CW).
Mitchell Kotler
Jian Kang
Chen Wang
Accenture (Switzerland) · CHChinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy in smoking cessation and safety of 2 and 4 mg nicotine mint lozenges in Chinese adult smokers.

methodsThis was a multicenter, randomized, stratified, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. The low-dependence stratum included 483 smokers (241 randomized to active 2 mg nicotine lozenge and 242 to placebo lozenge). The high-dependence stratum included 240 smokers (120 randomized to active 4 mg nicotine lozenge and 120 to placebo lozenge). The primary endpoint was successful smoking cessation at 6 weeks postquit, defined as continuous abstinence from smoking for the 28-day period up to and including the 6-week visit (verified by CO measurement). Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel tests were performed to compare quit rates between active nicotine and placebo separately for the high-dependence and low-dependence strata.

resultsThe primary analysis showed that in the low-dependence (2 mg) stratum, 59 subjects (24.5%) of 241 in the active nicotine group and 52 subjects (21.5%) of 242 in the placebo group were successful quitters (P = .3851). In the high-dependence (4 mg) stratum, 37 subjects (30.8%) of 120 in the active nicotine group and 24 subjects (20.2%) of 119 in the placebo group were successful quitters (P = .0565).

conclusionsThe 4 mg nicotine lozenge provided a directionally significant improvement in smoking cessation rates compared with placebo in Chinese adult smokers with high nicotine dependence for the primary endpoint. The 2 mg nicotine lozenge provided higher, but nonsignificant, smoking cessation rates than placebo. Both nicotine lozenges were generally well tolerated in Chinese adult smokers.

Indexed as

AdultDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMenthaMiddle AgedNicotineNicotinic AgonistsSmoking CessationTobacco Use Cessation DevicesTobacco Use DisorderNicotineNicotinic Agonists

Identifiers

PMID31658113
PMCPMC7012347
OpenAlexW2982621796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.