ArticleCancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers2019
Circulating plasma microRNA signature for the diagnosis of cervical cancer.
Article in Cancer biomarkers : section A of Disease markers, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Liquid Biopsy Biomarkers for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Identification of Circulating MicroRNAs as a Promising Diagnostic Biomarker for Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Early Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.BioMed research international · 2020Pooled it
- Comparative evaluation of microRNA detection in plasma, urine and liquid-based cytology for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Recent advancement in inflammatory biomarkers for cervical cancer diagnosis and therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Exosomes as Emerging Non-Invasive Biomarkers of Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2025Review
- Liquid biopsy biomarkers in cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The journal of liquid biopsy · 2025Review
- The application of liquid biopsy techniques in cervical cancer diagnosis, prediction and therapeutic surveillance.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2025Review
- Cervical Cancer Biomarkers in Non-Cervical Samples: Emerging Tools for Diagnosis and Prognosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Regulatory Genetic Networks by microRNAs: Exploring Genomic Signatures in Cervical Cancer.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- The role and diagnostic value of deregulated miRNAs in cervical cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Exosomal Biomarkers: A Comprehensive Overview of Diagnostic and Prognostic Applications in Malignant and Non-Malignant Disorders.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Biological functions of extracellular vesicle double C2-like domain beta in cervical cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- MicroRNA-Based Liquid Biopsy for Cervical Cancer Diagnostics and Treatment Monitoring.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- A novel microRNA miR-4433a-3p as a potential diagnostic biomarker for lung adenocarcinoma.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Article
- The role of extracellular vesicles in the pathogenesis of gynecological cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Exosomal noncoding RNAs in gynecological cancers: implications for therapy resistance and biomarkers.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
- Peripheral surrogates of tumor burden to guide chemotherapeutic and immunotherapeutic strategies for HPV-associated malignancies.Oncotarget · 2023Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine the utility of plasma microRNAs (miRNAs) as biomarkers in cervical cancer (CC).
methodsSome studies were conducted about the specific expression of plasma miRNAs in the diagnosis of CC. Plasma samples of 97 CC patients and 87 normal controls (NCs) were used to identify dysregulation of miRNAs in the training, testing, and external validation phases. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of identified individual miRNAs and miRNA panels for the diagnosis of CC. Expression levels of specific miRNAs were also examined in plasma exosomes and tissue samples of CC patients.
resultsFour plasma miRNAs (miR-146a-5p, miR-151a-3p, miR-2110 and miR-21-5p) which showed up-regulation were identified and validated in CC patients. A panel of the four miRNAs were constructed as potential diagnostic markers for CC. The AUCs of the panel of these four-miRNAs for the training, testing, and external validation phases were 0.911, 0.774, and 0.786, respectively. miR-146a-5p and miR-21-5p levels were all up-regulated in CC tissue specimens, whereas miR-146a-5p, miR-151a-3p, and miR-2110 levels were up-regulated in plasma exosomes.
conclusionThe signature of the four-miRNAs identified in peripheral plasma is a promising novel biomarker for the diagnosis of CC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.