The Culture of Trial Results Reporting at Academic Medical Centers.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Evaluating the current landscape of clinical trials registration and results reporting policies, procedures and staffing at US-based academic centers: Survey revisited.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025
   Article
2. Reporting of clinical trial safety results in ClinicalTrials.gov for FDA-approved drugs: A cross-sectional analysis.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2022
   Article
3. Addressing the quality of submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov for registration and results posting: The use of a checklist.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2020
   Article
4. What Does CME Accreditation Stand for?Journal of European CME · 2020
   Article
5. Is it time for computable evidence synthesis?Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Time From Submission of Johns Hopkins University Trial Results to Posting on ClinicalTrials.gov.2020

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as