Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31657703›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of rheumatology2019

Impact of antiphospholipid syndrome iBook on medical students' improvement of knowledge: An international randomized controlled study.

Stephane Zuily, Laurent Phialy, Ecem Sevim, Eloïse Germain, Ozan Unlu, Virginie Dufrost, Jessie Risse, Isabelle Clerc-Urmès, Cédric Baumann, Jessica R Berman and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of rheumatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05089669 (Effects of an Interactive E-book to Enhance Nursing Students' Knowledge and Self-efficacy of Nursing Skill), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 66% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05089669 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effects of an Interactive E-book to Enhance Nursing Students' Knowledge and Self-efficacy of Nursing Skill

TypeinterventionalSponsorTaipei Medical UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled62ConditionsHealthyArmsInteractive e-book, paper textbook
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephane ZuilyUniversité de Lorraine, Faculty of Medicine, F-54000 Nancy, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9326-6881
Laurent PhialyUniversité de Lorraine, Faculty of Medicine, F-54000 Nancy, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4905-3109
Ecem SevimHospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6458-9844
Eloïse GermainUniversité de Lorraine, Faculty of Medicine, F-54000 Nancy, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7492-6170
Ozan UnluWeill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0106-5004
Virginie DufrostUniversité de Lorraine, Faculty of Medicine, F-54000 Nancy, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0559-5798
Jessie RisseUniversité de Lorraine, Faculty of Medicine, F-54000 Nancy, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4801-4730
Isabelle Clerc-UrmèsCHRU de Nancy, Platform of Clinical Research Support PARC (MDS unity), F-54000 Nancy, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9844-4491
Cédric BaumannCHRU de Nancy, Platform of Clinical Research Support PARC (MDS unity), F-54000 Nancy, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4887-9459
Jessica R BermanHospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7472-0228
Michael D LockshinBarbara Volcker Center for Women and Rheumatic Diseases, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1034-0351
Denis WahlUniversité de Lorraine, Faculty of Medicine, F-54000 Nancy, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3556-9988
Doruk ErkanBarbara Volcker Center for Women and Rheumatic Diseases, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7216-677X
Hospital for Special Surgery · USCentre d’Investigation Clinique Innovation Technologique de Nancy · FRCornell University · USUniversité de Lorraine · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveiBook on Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) did not exist before our work, and hence the utility of an Apple iBook as a teaching method in APS for medical students has never been assessed. Our objective was to evaluate medical students' improvement of knowledge and satisfaction with an interactive APS iBook, in comparison with conventional teaching methods.

methodsAn iBook designer with the guidance of a medical team developed the APS iBook in both French and English. Second-year medical students, naïve of APS knowledge, were enrolled from two institutions. For the "teaching intervention", participants were randomly assigned to three groups: a) APS iBook with interactive capability; b) printed copy of the APS iBook material; and c) classroom lecture presentation of the APS iBook material by a physician-scientist experienced in APS. The participants filled a standardized medical questionnaire about APS before and after teaching interventions to determine the relative change of knowledge. Participants were asked to fill out a standardized satisfaction survey. After 20 weeks of the intervention, recall capability of students was tested.

resultsA total of 233 second-year medical students were enrolled (iBook group: 73; print group: 79, and lecture group: 81). Relative change of knowledge was not different between the iBook group and the printed material group; additionally, it was significantly higher in the lecture group than the two other methods. Satisfaction was significantly higher in both the lecture and the iBook groups than the print group, on several dimensions including overall quantitative satisfaction, subjective enhanced knowledge, interactivity, quality of content, comprehensibility, and pleasure of learning. Recall capability of students (n=109, 47%) was not significantly different among groups.

conclusionThe APS iBook is as effective as printed material in improving medical student's knowledge, although a classroom lecture was the most effective method when compared to self-learning methods. Among self-learning methods, medical students are more satisfied with the APS iBook, whereas the recall capability was not different among groups. These results suggest that the APS iBook will help medical students in their curriculum and increase the awareness of APS among the community.

Identifiers

PMID31657703
PMCPMC6812893
OpenAlexW3012486696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.