ArticleEuropean journal of rheumatology2019
The role of smoking in the development and progression of structural damage in axial SpA patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in European journal of rheumatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex differences in axial spondyloarthritis: biological mechanisms, clinical phenotypes, and therapeutic implications - a narrative review.Medicine and pharmacy reports · 2026Review
- Insights into axial spondyloarthritis features and the development of imaging evidence of sacroiliitis during long-term follow-up in routine clinical practice.Arthritis research & therapy · 2026Article
- Descriptive Analysis and Postoperative Surgical Complications of Ankylosing Spondylitis and Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis Patients at a Midwest Tertiary Referral Center.The Iowa orthopaedic journal · 2026Article
- Association of Low Free T3 with Disease Presence and Activity in Ankylosing Spondylitis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe objective of this study was to determine whether smoking was associated with the cumulative radiographic spinal damage and radiographic progression in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available studies to date.
methodsAn electronic search was conducted from inception to June 21, 2016, in EMBASE, the MEDLINE/PubMed Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. Cross-sectional and longitudinal cohort studies investigating the association between smoking and cumulative spinal structural damage or radiographic progression were included. The outcome of interest was the presence of syndesmophytes in cross-sectional studies and radiographic progression in longitudinal studies. The quality assessment was done using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality checklist. The authors of potentially relevant studies were contacted regarding the unpublished data. Data from eligible cross-sectional studies were extracted and arranged in a 2x2 table. The odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the dichotomous outcome of interest were computed.
resultsThe combined data of eight eligible cross-sectional studies for the assessment of association between smoking and cumulative spinal structural damage suggested a significant association (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.51-2.70). No significant heterogeneity was detected between studies (I
conclusionThe results of our meta-analysis show that smoking is associated with increased cumulative spinal structural damage in patients with AS. Therefore, rheumatologists should encourage patients with AS to quit smoking.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.