Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31657288›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2021

The reality of at risk mental state services: a response to recent criticisms.

Alison R Yung, Stephen J Wood, Ashok Malla, Barnaby Nelson, Patrick McGorry, Jai Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Real-world comprehensive care of people living with schizophrenia: recommendations across different settings and clinical stages.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Ethical challenges in contemporary psychiatry: an overview and an appraisal of possible strategies and research needs.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Preventive psychiatry: a blueprint for improving the mental health of young people.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alison R YungSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0401-9791
Stephen J WoodCentre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Ashok MallaDepartment of Psychiatry, Douglas Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Barnaby NelsonCentre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Patrick McGorryCentre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Jai ShahDepartment of Psychiatry, Douglas Research Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/K013599/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the 1990s criteria were developed to detect individuals at high and imminent risk of developing a psychotic disorder. These are known as the at risk mental state, ultra high risk or clinical high risk criteria. Individuals meeting these criteria are symptomatic and help-seeking. Services for such individuals are now found worldwide. Recently Psychological Medicine published two articles that criticise these services and suggest that they should be dismantled or restructured. One paper also provides recommendations on how ARMS services should be operate.

methodsIn this paper we draw on the existing literature in the field and present the perspective of some ARMS clinicians and researchers.

resultsMany of the critics' arguments are refuted. Most of the recommendations included in the Moritz et al. paper are already occurring.

conclusionsARMS services provide management of current problems, treatment to reduce risk of onset of psychotic disorder and monitoring of mental state, including attenuated psychotic symptoms. These symptoms are associated with a range of poor outcomes. It is important to assess them and track their trajectory over time. A new approach to detection of ARMS individuals can be considered that harnesses broad youth mental health services, such as headspace in Australia, Jigsaw in Ireland and ACCESS Open Minds in Canada. Attention should also be paid to the physical health of ARMS individuals. Far from needing to be dismantled we feel that the ARMS approach has much to offer to improve the health of young people.

Indexed as

AustraliaCanadaHumansIrelandMental Health ServicesPsychotic DisordersRisk AssessmentSurveys and QuestionnairesAt risk mental stateclinical high riskprodromalpsychosisschizophreniaultra high risk

Identifiers

PMID31657288
PMCPMC7893503

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.