Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31657146›Full record

ArticleMicrobial biotechnology2020

Rationale-based selection of optimal operating strategies and gene dosage impact on recombinant protein production in Komagataella phaffii (Pichia pastoris).

Miguel Angel Nieto-Taype, Javier Garrigós-Martínez, Marc Sánchez-Farrando, Francisco Valero, Xavier Garcia-Ortega, José Luis Montesinos-Seguí

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Enabling growth-decoupledFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Miguel Angel Nieto-TaypeDepartment of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-1055-0658
Javier Garrigós-MartínezDepartment of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2271-2220
Marc Sánchez-FarrandoDepartment of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain.
Francisco ValeroDepartment of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0429-9620
Xavier Garcia-OrtegaDepartment of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7833-3655
José Luis Montesinos-SeguíDepartment of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-9941-0832

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Its features as a microbial and eukaryotic organism have turned Komagataella phaffii (Pichia pastoris) into an emerging cell factory for recombinant protein production (RPP). As a key step of the bioprocess development, this work aimed to demonstrate the importance of tailor designing the cultivation strategy according to the production kinetics of the cell factory. For this purpose, K. phaffii clones constitutively expressing (P

Indexed as

PichiaGene DosageRecombinant ProteinsSaccharomycetalesRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID31657146
PMCPMC7017824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.