Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31657113›Full record

ReviewAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)2020

Quantitative Particle Uptake by Cells as Analyzed by Different Methods.

Sumaira Ashraf, Alaa Hassan Said, Raimo Hartmann, Marcus-Alexander Assmann, Neus Feliu, Peter Lenz, Wolfgang J Parak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The application of label-free Raman microscopy to monitor particle-cell interactions inComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Exocytosis of Nanoparticles: A Comprehensive Review.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sumaira AshrafFachbereich Physik, Philipps Universität Marburg, 35037, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8005-2393
Alaa Hassan SaidFachbereich Physik, Philipps Universität Marburg, 35037, Marburg, Germany.
Raimo HartmannFachbereich Physik, Philipps Universität Marburg, 35037, Marburg, Germany.
Marcus-Alexander AssmannFachbereich Physik, Philipps Universität Marburg, 35037, Marburg, Germany.
Neus FeliuFachbereich Physik und Chemie, CHyN, Universität Hamburg, 20146, Hamburg, Germany.
Peter LenzFachbereich Physik, Philipps Universität Marburg, 35037, Marburg, Germany.
Wolfgang J ParakFachbereich Physik und Chemie, CHyN, Universität Hamburg, 20146, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1672-6650

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a large number of two-dimensional static in vitro studies about the uptake of colloidal nano- and microparticles, which has been published in the last decade. In this Minireview, different methods used for such studies are summarized and critically discussed. Supplementary experimental data allow for a direct comparison of the different techniques. Emphasis is given on how quantitative parameters can be extracted from studies in which different experimental techniques have been used, with the goal of allowing better comparison.

Indexed as

Biological TransportCapsulesCell LineFlow CytometryHumansMass SpectrometryMicroscopy, ElectronNanoparticlesParticle SizePolyelectrolytesCapsulesPolyelectrolytesbioanalyticscellsnanoparticlesparticle uptake

Identifiers

PMID31657113
PMCPMC7155048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.