Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31657066›Full record

ArticleAndrologia2020

Is testosterone replacement an effective treatment of secondary premature ejaculation?

İbrahim Nuvit Tahtali

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Andrologia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

İbrahim Nuvit TahtaliDepartment of Urology, Malatya Research and Training Hospital, Malatya, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4256-734X
Malatya Devlet Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are very few studies that have evaluated premature ejaculation characteristics in regard to subtypes. Additionally, to our knowledge, there are no studies which have explored testosterone replacement therapy in secondary premature ejaculation patients with testosterone deficiency. Therefore, our aims were as follows: (a) to determine the characteristics of patients with premature ejaculation in regard to the four subtypes of premature ejaculation and (b) to determine the efficacy of testosterone replacement therapy in the treatment of testosterone-deficient patients with secondary premature ejaculation. Patients who applied to our clinic from May 2010 to August 2018 with premature ejaculation were included in this study. The mean age of the study group was 36.42 (min-max: 24-52) years. Those with secondary premature ejaculation were found to have significantly lower testosterone concentration compared to the other groups. Shortest mean intravaginal ejaculation latency time and lowest International Index of Erectile Function-5 score were found among those with secondary PE. In regard to treatment results, recipients of testosterone replacement demonstrated a 4.8-fold increase in mean intravaginal ejaculation latency time, while dapoxetine recipients had a 1.8-fold increase. Our findings demonstrate that testosterone replacement may be a promising treatment for those with secondary PE in the presence of testosterone deficiency.

Indexed as

AdultBenzylaminesEjaculationHormone Replacement TherapyHumansMaleMiddle AgedNaphthalenesPatient SatisfactionPremature EjaculationRetrospective StudiesSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsTestosteroneTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultBenzylaminesdapoxetineNaphthalenesSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsTestosteroneintravaginal ejaculation latency timepremature ejaculationtestosterone deficiencytestosterone replacement

Identifiers

PMID31657066
OpenAlexW2982502580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.