ArticleHealth services research2019
Coordinated Care Organizations and mortality among low-income infants in Oregon.
Article in Health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Commonality of 25 component themes of integrated care for children: rapid review of 170 models.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Measuring the association of Medicaid Accountable Care Organizations on total cost of care across the perinatal period.Health affairs scholar · 2026Article
- Effect of Medicaid accountable care on preventable emergency department and hospital admissions: rural-urban heterogeneity.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- Massachusetts Medicaid ACO Program May Have Improved Care Use And Quality For Pregnant And Postpartum Enrollees.Health affairs (Project Hope) · 2024Article
- Analysis of North Carolina Medicaid Claims Data to Simulate a Pediatric Accountable Care Organization.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- Coordinated Care Organizations and mortality among low-income infants in Oregon.Health services research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the impact of Oregon's Coordinated Care Organizations (CCOs), an accountable care model for Oregon Medicaid enrollees implemented in 2012, on neonatal and infant mortality. DATA SOURCES: Oregon birth certificates linked with death certificates, and Medicaid/CCO enrollment files for years 2008-2016. STUDY
designThe sample consisted of the pre-CCO birth cohort of 135 753 infants (August 2008-July 2011) and the post-CCO birth cohort of 148 650 infants (August 2012-December 2015). We used a difference-in-differences probit model to estimate the difference in mortality between infants enrolled in Medicaid and infants who were not enrolled. We examined heterogeneous effects of CCOs for preterm and full-term infants and the impact of CCOs over the implementation timeline. All models were adjusted for maternal and infant characteristics and secular time trends. PRINCIPAL
findingsThe CCO model was associated with a 56 percent reduction in infant mortality compared to the pre-CCO level (-0.20 percentage points [95% CI: -0.35; -0.05]), and also with a greater reduction in infant mortality among preterm infants compared to full-term infants. The impact on mortality grew in magnitude over the postimplementation timeline.
conclusionsThe CCO model contributed to a reduction in mortality within the first year of birth among infants enrolled in Medicaid.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.