ReviewTranslational andrology and urology2019
The laser of the future: reality and expectations about the new thulium fiber laser-a systematic review.
Review in Translational andrology and urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06266793 (Comparison of Lumenis Pulse 120H Moses 2.0 Holmium Laser vs. Olympus Soltive Thulium Fiber Laser for Mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 129 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Lumenis Pulse 120H Moses 2.0 Holmium Laser vs. Olympus Soltive Thulium Fiber Laser for Mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Who cites it
129 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 249 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complications of thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis by the EAU-YAU endourology and urolithiasis working group.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Thulium fiber laser versus holmium: YAG laser for ureteroscopic lithotripsy of ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World journal of urology · 2026Pooled it
- Stone dust in endourology: a systematic review of its definition, management, and clinical impact.BJU international · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of thulium fiber laser versus holmium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser in lithotripsy for urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Urolithiasis · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of Thulium Fiber Laser versus Holmium laser in ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a Meta-analysis and systematic review.BMC urology · 2024Pooled it
- Super pulsed thulium fiber laser outcomes in retrograde intrarenal surgery for ureteral and renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC urology · 2023Pooled it
- Outcomes of thulium fibre laser for treatment of urinary tract stones: results of a systematic review.Current opinion in urology · 2021Pooled it
- Correlation of Operative Time with Outcomes of Ureteroscopy and Stone Treatment: a Systematic Review of Literature.Current urology reports · 2020Pooled it
- Thulium fiber laser versus Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: 24-month outcomes from a prospective randomized non-inferiority trial.World journal of urology · 2026Trial
- Outcomes of holmium: YAG laser vs. Thulium fiber laser for ureteric stones during ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy - a prospective, randomized single-centre study.World journal of urology · 2025Trial
- Thulium fiber laser vs. holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: results of a prospective randomized non-inferiority trial.World journal of urology · 2024Trial
- Thulium fiber laser vs Ho:YAG in RIRS: a prospective randomized clinical trial assessing the efficacy of lasers and different fiber diameters (150 µm and 200 µm).World journal of urology · 2023Trial
- A comparison among RIRS and MiniPerc for renal stones between 10 and 20 mm using thulium fiber laser (Fiber Dust): a randomized controlled trial.World journal of urology · 2022Trial
- Pulsed Thulium:Yag, Thulium Fiber, and Holmium:Yag Lasers in Mini-PCNL: A Three-Arm Comparative Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Thulium fiber laser cauterization approach to congenital pyriform sinus fistula: a case series.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Assessing the trifecta of enucleation using Magneto laser energy on different prostate volumes in real world practice, an EAU-endourology and AUSET collaboration.World journal of urology · 2026Observational
- Novel 30-amp MOSES versus MOSES 2.0 pulse-modulation technologies for holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP).World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Health-related quality of life after thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: a prospective study according to stone localization.Scientific reports · 2026Observational
- Posterior urethral hemangioma presenting as hematospermia in an adolescent male.Urology case reports · 2026Article
- HoLEP versus ThuFLEP: perioperative and functional outcomes in prostate enucleation.Lasers in medical science · 2026Article
69 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) laser has been the gold-standard for laser lithotripsy over the last 20 years. However, recent reports about a new prototype thulium fiber laser (TFL) lithotripter have revealed impressive levels of performance. We therefore decided to systematically review the reality and expectations for this new TFL technology. This review was registered in the PROSPERO registry (CRD42019128695). A PubMed search was performed for papers including specific terms relevant to this systematic review published between the years 2015 and 2019, including already accepted but not yet published papers. Additionally, the medical sections of ScienceDirect, Wiley, SpringerLink, Mary Ann Liebert publishers, and Google Scholar were also searched for peer-reviewed abstract presentations. All relevant studies and data identified in the bibliographic search were selected, categorized, and summarized. The authors adhered to PRISMA guidelines for this review. The TFL emits laser radiation at a wavelength of 1,940 nm, and has an optical penetration depth in water about four-times shorter than the Ho:YAG laser. This results in four-times lower stone ablation thresholds, as well as lower tissue ablation thresholds. As the TFL uses electronically-modulated laser diodes, it offers the most comprehensive and flexible range of laser parameters among laser lithotripters, with pulse frequencies up to 2,200 Hz, very low to very high pulse energies (0.005-6 J), short to very long-pulse durations (200 µs up to 12 ms), and a total power level up to 55 W. The stone ablation efficiency is up to four-times that of the Ho:YAG laser for similar laser parameters, with associated implications for speed and operating time. When using dusting settings, the TFL outperforms the Ho:YAG laser in dust quantity and quality, producing much finer particles. Retropulsion is also significantly reduced and sometimes even absent with the TFL. The TFL can use small laser fibers (as small as 50 µm core), with resulting advantages in irrigation, scope deflection, retropulsion reduction, and (in)direct effects on accessibility, visibility, efficiency, and surgical time, as well as offering future miniaturization possibilities. Similar to the Ho:YAG laser, the TFL can also be used for soft tissue applications such as prostate enucleation (ThuFLEP). The TFL machine itself is seven times smaller and eight times lighter than a high-power Ho:YAG laser system, and consumes nine times less energy. Maintenance is expected to be very low due to the durability of its components. The safety profile is also better in many aspects, i.e., for patients, instruments, and surgeons. The advantages of the TFL over the Ho:YAG laser are simply too extensive to be ignored. The TFL appears to be a real alternative to the Ho:YAG laser and become a true game-changer in laser lithotripsy. Due to its novelty, further studies are needed to broaden our understanding of the TFL, and comprehend the full implications and benefits of this new technology, as well its limitations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.