ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2019
Recommendations for lung cancer screening in Southern Africa.
Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Experiences of volunteers: A volunteer-led community strategy for lung cancer awareness and mobilisation in KwaZulu-Natal.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2026Article
- Scars That Speak: Unraveling the Oncogenic Aftermath of Pulmonary Tuberculosis-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Primary pulmonary leiomyosarcoma in a patient with disseminated pulmonary tuberculosis and constrictive pericarditis.Respiratory medicine case reports · 2026Article
- Long-term outcome of surgery for lung cancer in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ecancermedicalscience · 2025Review
- Finding the missed millions: innovations to bring tuberculosis diagnosis closer to key populations.BMC global and public health · 2024Review
- Recommended approaches for screening and early detection of lung cancer in the Middle East and Africa (MEA) region: a consensus statement.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Review
- Article
- Assessment of non-tuberculosis abnormalities on digital chest x-rays with high CAD4TB scores from a tuberculosis prevalence survey in Zambia and South Africa.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
- Epidemiological Study of Risk Factors for Lung Cancer in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Lung cancer in people living with HIV: a different kettle of fish?African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2022Article
- Staging and operability of primary lung cancer in Western Cape Province, South Africa.African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2022Article
- Modern techniques for staging lung cancer - improved precision but too late for too many.African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2022Article
- Evaluation of the reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines on lung cancer using the RIGHT checklist.Translational lung cancer research · 2021Article
- The challenges of implementing low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in low- and middle-income countries.Nature cancer · 2020Review
- Attitudes toward tobacco cessation and lung cancer screening in two South African communities.Global public health · 2020Article
- Scar carcinoma - a real entity or a historical 'histological curiosity'?African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in southern Africa. Early trials of chest radiograph-based screening in males at high risk for lung cancer found no mortality benefit of a radiograph alone, or a radiograph plus sputum cytology screening strategy. Large prospective studies, including the National Lung Screening Trial, have shown an all-cause mortality benefit when low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) was used as a screening modality in patients that are at high risk of developing lung cancer. The South African Thoracic Society, based on these findings, and those from several international guidelines, recommend that annual LDCT should be offered to patients between 55-74 years of age who are current or former smokers (having quit within the preceding 15 years), with at least a 30-pack year smoking history and with no history of lung cancer. Patients should be in general good health, fit for surgery, and willing to undergo further investigations if deemed necessary. Given the high local prevalence of tuberculosis (TB) infection and post-TB lung disease, which can radiographically mimic lung cancer, a conservative threshold (nodule size ≥6 mm) should be used to determine whether the baseline LDCT screen is positive (thus nodules <6 mm require no action until the next annual screen). If a non-calcified, solid or partly solid nodule is ≥6 mm, but <10 mm with no malignant features (e.g., distinct spiculated margins), the LDCT should be repeated in 6 months. If a solid nodule or the largest component of a non-solid nodule is ≥10 or ≥6 mm and enlarging or with additional malignant features present, definitive action to exclude lung cancer is warranted. Patients should be screened annually until 15 years have elapsed from date of smoking cessation, they turn 80, become unfit for a curative operation or significant changes are observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.