Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31656641›Full record

ReviewJournal of thoracic disease2019

Recommendations for lung cancer screening in Southern Africa.

Coenraad F N Koegelenberg, Shane Dorfman, Ivan Schewitz, Guy A Richards, Shaun Maasdorp, Clifford Smith, Keertan Dheda, South African Thoracic Society

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of thoracic disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Epidemiological Study of Risk Factors for Lung Cancer in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Lung cancer in people living with HIV: a different kettle of fish?African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Staging and operability of primary lung cancer in Western Cape Province, South Africa.African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2022
    Article
  13. Modern techniques for staging lung cancer - improved precision but too late for too many.African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Scar carcinoma - a real entity or a historical 'histological curiosity'?African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Coenraad F N KoegelenbergDivision of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine, Stellenbosch University and Tygerberg Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Shane DorfmanDiagnostic Radiological Services (DRS) Inc., Alberton, South Africa.
Ivan SchewitzDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Pretoria University and Steve Biko Hospital, Pretoria, South Africa.
Guy A RichardsDepartments of Pulmonology and Critical Care, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Shaun MaasdorpDivision of Pulmonology and Critical Care, Department of Medicine, University of the Free State and Universitas Academic Hospital, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Clifford SmithMorningside Mediclinic, Sandton, South Africa.
Keertan DhedaCentre for Lung Infection and Immunity, Division of Pulmonology, Department of Medicine and UCT Lung Institute & South African MRC/UCT Centre for the Study of Antimicrobial Resistance, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
South African Thoracic Society

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in southern Africa. Early trials of chest radiograph-based screening in males at high risk for lung cancer found no mortality benefit of a radiograph alone, or a radiograph plus sputum cytology screening strategy. Large prospective studies, including the National Lung Screening Trial, have shown an all-cause mortality benefit when low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) was used as a screening modality in patients that are at high risk of developing lung cancer. The South African Thoracic Society, based on these findings, and those from several international guidelines, recommend that annual LDCT should be offered to patients between 55-74 years of age who are current or former smokers (having quit within the preceding 15 years), with at least a 30-pack year smoking history and with no history of lung cancer. Patients should be in general good health, fit for surgery, and willing to undergo further investigations if deemed necessary. Given the high local prevalence of tuberculosis (TB) infection and post-TB lung disease, which can radiographically mimic lung cancer, a conservative threshold (nodule size ≥6 mm) should be used to determine whether the baseline LDCT screen is positive (thus nodules <6 mm require no action until the next annual screen). If a non-calcified, solid or partly solid nodule is ≥6 mm, but <10 mm with no malignant features (e.g., distinct spiculated margins), the LDCT should be repeated in 6 months. If a solid nodule or the largest component of a non-solid nodule is ≥10 or ≥6 mm and enlarging or with additional malignant features present, definitive action to exclude lung cancer is warranted. Patients should be screened annually until 15 years have elapsed from date of smoking cessation, they turn 80, become unfit for a curative operation or significant changes are observed.

Indexed as

low dose computed tomographyLung cancerscreening

Identifiers

PMID31656641
PMCPMC6790462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.