Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31656604›Full record

SynthesisJournal of global health2019

The impact of maternal nutrition on offspring's risk of non-communicable diseases in adulthood: a systematic review.

Jessie Pullar, Kremlin Wickramasinghe, Alessandro R Demaio, Nia Roberts, Karla-Maria Perez-Blanco, Katharine Noonan, Nick Townsend

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of global health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Maternal Supplementation withDiseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Jessie PullarCentre on Population Approaches for NCD Prevention, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Kremlin WickramasingheCentre on Population Approaches for NCD Prevention, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Alessandro R DemaioEvidence and Programme Guidance, Department of Nutrition for Health and Development, World Health Organisation, Geneva, Switzerland.
Nia RobertsHealth Library, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Karla-Maria Perez-BlancoCentre on Population Approaches for NCD Prevention, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Katharine NoonanCentre on Population Approaches for NCD Prevention, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Nick TownsendCentre on Population Approaches for NCD Prevention, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
University of Oxford · GBGuidance (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA growing body of evidence suggests the impact of maternal nutrition plays a role in determining offspring's risk of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including heart disease (CVD), type 2 diabetes (T2DM), cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (COPD). We conducted a systematic review to investigate this relationship.

methodsWe systematically searched CINAHL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science Core Collection and Global Health for papers published before May 2016 (PROSPERO: CRD42016039244, CRD42016039247). Included studies examined the impact of maternal nutrition (diet, vitamin status and weight) on adult offspring's NCD outcomes.

resultsOf 23 501 identified citations, 20 met our inclusion criteria. Heterogeneity of papers required narrative synthesis. Included studies involved 1 939 786 participants. CVD: Four papers examined maternal exposure to famine during gestation, 3 identified a resulting increased risk of CVD in offspring. Five identified an increased risk of offspring CVD with increasing maternal weight. T2DM: Six studies investigated maternal exposure to famine during gestation; three identified an increase in offspring's T2DM risk. Three found no increased risk; two of these were in circumstances where famine states persisted beyond pregnancy. Three papers found an increased risk of T2DM in offspring with increasing maternal BMI. CANCER: Four papers investigated maternal famine exposure during pregnancy - two identified a reduced risk of cancer in male offspring, and two an increased risk in female offspring. COPD: One study found low maternal vitamin D status was associated with reduced use of asthma medication.

conclusionsWhile there are indications that exposure to both famine (particularly when coupled with exposure to nutritional excess after birth) and maternal overweight during pregnancy is associated with offspring's risk of CVD, T2DM and cancer, currently there is a lack of evidence to confirm this relationship. Despite the lack of conclusive evidence, these finding hold important research and policy implications for a lifecycle approach to the prevention of NCDs.

Indexed as

Maternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAdultFemaleHumansNoncommunicable DiseasesPregnancyRisk

Identifiers

PMID31656604
PMCPMC6790233
OpenAlexW2976587368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.