Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31656548›Full record

ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2019

BAYESIAN METHODS FOR MULTIPLE MEDIATORS: RELATING PRINCIPAL STRATIFICATION AND CAUSAL MEDIATION IN THE ANALYSIS OF POWER PLANT EMISSION CONTROLS.

Chanmin Kim, Michael J Daniels, Joseph W Hogan, Christine Choirat, Corwin M Zigler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Bayesian Sparse Mediation Analysis with Targeted Penalization of Natural Indirect Effects.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chanmin KimBoston University School of Public Health.
Michael J DanielsUniversity of Florida.
Joseph W HoganBrown University School of Public Health.
Christine ChoiratHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.
Corwin M ZiglerHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health.

Funding

Statistical Methods for the Spatio-Temporal Assessment of Social Disparities in CancerP01CA134294 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI HANEUSE, SEBASTIEN, HERNAN, MIGUEL · 2008 to 2017
$6.8M
Bayesian Methods for Comparative Effectiveness Research with Observational DataR01GM111339 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NORMAND, SHARON-LISE TERESA · 2015 to 2018
$2.5M
Causal Inference with Interference for Evaluating Air Quality PoliciesR01ES026217 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ZIGLER, CORWIN MATTHEW · 2016 to 2021
$2.2M
BAYESIAN APPROACHES FOR MISSINGNESS AND CAUSALITY IN CANCER AND BEHAVIOR STUDIESR01CA183854 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI DANIELS, MICHAEL J · 2014 to 2019
$1.7M
Non-Parametric Bayesian Methods for Causal InferenceR01GM112327 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ROY, JASON A · 2014 to 2017
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA134294NCI NIH HHS R01 CA183854NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES026217NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM111339NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM112327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emission control technologies installed on power plants are a key feature of many air pollution regulations in the US. While such regulations are predicated on the presumed relationships between emissions, ambient air pollution, and human health, many of these relationships have never been empirically verified. The goal of this paper is to develop new statistical methods to quantify these relationships. We frame this problem as one of mediation analysis to evaluate the extent to which the effect of a particular control technology on ambient pollution is mediated through causal effects on power plant emissions. Since power plants emit various compounds that contribute to ambient pollution, we develop new methods for multiple intermediate variables that are measured contemporaneously, may interact with one another, and may exhibit joint mediating effects. Specifically, we propose new methods leveraging two related frameworks for causal inference in the presence of mediating variables: principal stratification and causal mediation analysis. We define principal effects based on multiple mediators, and also introduce a new decomposition of the total effect of an intervention on ambient pollution into the natural direct effect and natural indirect effects for all combinations of mediators. Both approaches are anchored to the same observed-data models, which we specify with Bayesian nonparametric techniques. We provide assumptions for estimating principal causal effects, then augment these with an additional assumption required for causal mediation analysis. The two analyses, interpreted in tandem, provide the first empirical investigation of the presumed causal pathways that motivate important air quality regulatory policies.

Indexed as

Ambient PM2.5Bayesian nonparametricsGaussian copulaMulti-PollutantsNatural indirect effect

Identifiers

PMID31656548
PMCPMC6814408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.