Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31656520›Full record

ReviewIranian journal of veterinary research2019

Humic acid as a feed additive in poultry diets: a review.

M Arif, M Alagawany, M E Abd El-Hack, M Saeed, M A Arain, S S Elnesr

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Iranian journal of veterinary research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Humic Substances as a Versatile Intermediary.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M ArifDepartment of Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture, University of Sargodha, Punjab, 40100, Pakistan.
M AlagawanyDepartment of Poultry, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44511, Egypt.
M E Abd El-HackDepartment of Poultry, Faculty of Agriculture, Zagazig University, Zagazig, 44511, Egypt.
M SaeedDepartment of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Sciences and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China.
M A ArainDepartment of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Sciences and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, 712100, China.
S S ElnesrPoultry Production Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Fayoum University, Fayoum, 63514, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many studies tested different feed additives, among these additives, humic substances (HS) have been used in livestock and poultry diets. Humic substances commonly present in nature as they are created from the organic matter decomposition, and are normally found in the soil and natural water. Active components of HS consist of humic acid (HA), humus, ulmic acid, fulvic acid, humin and certain microelements. Humic acid is widely used as an alternative growth promoter for antibiotics in improving poultry performance and health. Moreover, supplementation of a commercial substance as a source of HS through the drinking water or diet improved the feed consumption, feed efficiency and weight gain of broiler chickens, and also improved egg weight, egg mass, and egg production of laying hens. This review describes the useful applications and recent facets of HA including its modes of action and various valuable uses in improving the production and health safeguarding of livestock and poultry.

Indexed as

Growth promoterHealthHumic acidPerformancePoultry

Identifiers

PMID31656520
PMCPMC6811714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.