ArticleAfrican health sciences2019
Article in African health sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Traditional ecological knowledge and practices in Zimbabwe: medicinal ethnobotany and ethnozoology among communities in Chipinge district.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the Potential Hypoglycaemic Properties ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A comprehensiveFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Review
- UPLC-ESI-QTOF-MS Profiling of Phenolic Compounds fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Antidiabetic and Toxicological Effects of the Tea Infusion of Summer Collection fromPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Natural products for the treatment and management of diabetes mellitus in Zimbabwe-a review.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Antihyperglycemic and Antilipidemic Properties of a Tea Infusion of the Leaves fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- The ameliorative activity ofHeliyon · 2021Article
- Resurgence of non-communicable diseases in LMICs: a cause for concern?African health sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
methods
resultsTreatment of cells with plant extract significantly increased glucose uptake in a concentration dependent manner, with the highest concentration (250 µg/ml) giving 28% increased uptake compared to the negative control. The increase in glucose uptake (2.5 times more than control) was coupled to increase in GLUT 4 mRNA and subsequently GLUT 4 translocation. Wortmannin expunged the
conclusionThe results suggest that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.