Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31656403›Full record

ArticleProceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)2019

Assessing adherence and cost-benefit of colorectal cancer screening for accountable providers.

Trace Heavener, Frank W McStay, Victoria Jaeger, Kristen Stephenson, Lauren Sager, James Sing

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Genetic Testing.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Trace HeavenerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center-TempleTempleTexas.ORCID 0000-0002-1407-8736
Frank W McStayCenter for Healthcare Policy, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center-TempleTempleTexas.
Victoria JaegerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center-TempleTempleTexas.ORCID 0000-0002-8583-3081
Kristen StephensonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center-TempleTempleTexas.
Lauren SagerOffice of Biostatistics, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center-TempleTempleTexas.
James SingDepartment of Gastroenterology, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center-TempleTempleTexas.ORCID 0000-0001-5563-0104
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess adherence and costs-benefits of colorectal cancer (CRC) screenings from an accountable care organization/population health perspective. We performed a retrospective review of 94 patients (50-75 years of age) in an integrated safety net system for whom fecal CRC screening was abnormal for the period of June 1, 2014, to June 1, 2016. A cost-benefit model was constructed using Medicare payment rates and a sensitivity analysis. Most patients included in the study (64/94, 68%) received or were offered a colonoscopy. Of those receiving a colonoscopy, 24 of 45 (53%) had an abnormal finding. Total direct medical costs avoided by screening the patient panel was $32,926 but could have exceeded $63,237 had more patients received follow-up colonoscopies. A sensitivity analysis with 1000 patients demonstrated total monetary benefits between $2.2 million and $8.16 million when follow-up and colonoscopy rates were allowed to vary. Although the resulting rates of follow-up were within the range reported in the literature, there is room for improvement, especially considering the monetary benefit that could be used on other diseases. Health systems and payers should work cooperatively to structure payment models to better incentivize CRC screenings.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancer screeningcost-benefit modelpreventive care

Identifiers

PMID31656403
PMCPMC6793958
OpenAlexW2969684191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.