Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31656350›Full record

ArticleRadiologia brasileira

State of the art in vulvar cancer imaging.

Maria Ana Serrado, Mariana Horta, Teresa Margarida Cunha

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiologia brasileira. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Staging by imaging in gynecologic cancer and the role of ultrasound: an update of European joint consensus statements.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Ana SerradoRadiology Department, Hospital Central do Funchal, Funchal, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4852-6960
Mariana HortaRadiology Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6834-6225
Teresa Margarida CunhaRadiology Department, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, Lisboa, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2411-0207
Instituto Português de Oncologia de Coimbra Francisco Gentil · PTHospital Dr. Nélio Mendonça · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vulvar carcinoma is an uncommon tumor that predominantly affects postmenopausal women. Currently, there is no screening procedure for vulvar carcinoma; in most cases, it is diagnosed only when symptoms appear. The most widely used staging system is that developed by the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Lymph node status is the most important prognostic factor. We searched the PubMed/Medline database to identify relevant English-language articles on vulvar cancer, with a special focus on its imaging evaluation. Magnetic resonance imaging is useful for local and nodal staging, as well as facilitating the planning of surgical interventions and radiotherapy. Computed tomography or positron-emission tomography/computed tomography can play an important role in nodal and distant disease assessment, whereas ultrasound is often used for image-guided biopsies. Imaging is pivotal for staging and treatment planning in vulvar carcinoma.

Indexed as

CarcinomaLymph nodesRadiologyVulvaVulvar neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID31656350
PMCPMC6808606
OpenAlexW2971316442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.