Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31656309›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2019

Quantitative and Qualitative Analyses of Psychological Experience and Adjustment of In Vitro Fertilization-Embryo Transfer Patients.

Lin Kong, Yun Shao, Jing Xia, Jiyang Han, Yuhua Zhan, Guo Liu, Xumei Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects ofFrontiers in reproductive health · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lin KongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Assisted Reproduction Center, Shengjing Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China (mainland).
Yun ShaoDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China (mainland).
Jing XiaDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China (mainland).
Jiyang HanDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China (mainland).
Yuhua ZhanDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China (mainland).
Guo LiuDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China (mainland).
Xumei WangDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China (mainland).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to quantitatively analyze the psychosocial characteristics of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) couples and normal couples, and to identify the influencing factors of psychological characteristics and pregnancy outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS There were 260 infertile couples undergoing IVF-ET and 277 healthy couples of childbearing age in Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University recruited into 2 groups. Psychosocial characteristics were compared to analyze the influencing factors of pregnancy outcomes after IVF-ET. In-depth interviews (n=11) and infertility-related forum posts (n=12) were adopted to obtain the data related to the psychological experience and adjustment. Nvivo 11 software was utilized to collect and analyze the data. RESULTS The levels of anxiety and depression in the IVF-ET group were significantly higher (both P<0.01), the total scores of marital quality scale and social support scale were significantly lower (both P<0.05), immature defense mechanism score was significantly higher (P<0.05), and mature defense mechanism score (P<0.05) was significantly lower than those in the control group. Bod mass index (BMI), family's rural residence, marital quality, and immature and mature defense mechanisms were influencing factors of depression in IVF-ET female patients (all P<0.05). Marital quality, mature and immature defense mechanisms, concealment factors, and Harm Avoidance (HA) score were influencing factors of depression in IVF-ET males (all P<0.05). The age of the female patient was an independent influencing factor of IVF-ET pregnancy success rate (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS The mental health levels of IVF-ET patients were worse than those of fertile couples. The younger the female infertile patient, the higher pregnancy rate of IVF-ET.

Indexed as

AdultAnxietyChinaEmbryo TransferFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansInfertility, FemaleInterview, PsychologicalMaleMental HealthPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy Rate

Identifiers

PMID31656309
PMCPMC6836641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.