Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31656165›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2019

Retroclavicular vs Infraclavicular block for brachial plexus anesthesia: a multi-centric randomized trial.

Andrés Felipe Gil Blanco, Pascal Laferrière-Langlois, David Jessop, Frédérick D'Aragon, Yanick Sansoucy, Natalie Albert, Pascal Tétreault, Pablo Echave

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02913625 (Retroclavicular Approach vs Infraclavicular Approach for Plexic Bloc Anesthesia of the Upper Limb), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02913625 nacompletednot on this map

Retroclavicular Approach vs Infraclavicular Approach for Plexic Bloc Anesthesia of the Upper Limb: a Multi-centric Non-inferiority Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversité de SherbrookeRan2016 to 2017Enrolled110ConditionsHand InjuryArmsUltrasound guided retroclavicular block, Ultrasound guided infraclavicular block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrés Felipe Gil BlancoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medicine and Health Sciences Faculty, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), 3001, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H 5N4, Canada.
Pascal Laferrière-LangloisDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medicine and Health Sciences Faculty, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), 3001, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H 5N4, Canada.
David JessopDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medicine and Health Sciences Faculty, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Laval (CHUL), 2705 boul Laurier, Quebec, G1V 4G2, QC, Canada.
Frédérick D'AragonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medicine and Health Sciences Faculty, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), 3001, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H 5N4, Canada.
Yanick SansoucyDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medicine and Health Sciences Faculty, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), 3001, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H 5N4, Canada.
Natalie AlbertDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medicine and Health Sciences Faculty, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Laval (CHUL), 2705 boul Laurier, Quebec, G1V 4G2, QC, Canada.
Pascal TétreaultDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 1098 Research Transition Facility, Edmonton, T6G 2V2, AB, Canada.
Pablo EchaveDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medicine and Health Sciences Faculty, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), 3001, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, QC, J1H 5N4, Canada. Pablo.Echave@USherbrooke.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-0098-1657

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe coracoid approach is a simple method to perform ultrasound-guided brachial plexus regional anesthesia (RA) but its simplicity is counterbalanced by a difficult needle visualization. We hypothesized that the retroclavicular (RCB) approach is not longer to perform when compared to the coracoid (ICB) approach, and improves needle visualization.

methodsThis randomized, controlled, non-inferiority trial conducted in two hospitals, included patients undergoing distal upper limb surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to a brachial plexus block (ICB or RCB). The primary outcome was performance time (sum of visualization and needling time), and was analyzed with a non-inferiority test of averages. Depth of sensory and motor blockade, surgical success, total anesthesia time, needle visualization, number of needle passes and complications were also evaluated. Subgroup analysis restricted to patients with higher body mass index was completed.

resultsWe included 109 patients between September 2016 and May 2017. Mean RCB performance time was 4.8 ± 2.0 min while ICB was 5.2 ± 2.3 min (p = 0.06) with a 95% CI reaching up to 5.8% longer. RCB conferred an ultrasound-needle angle closer to 0° and significantly improved needle visibility after the clavicle was cleared and before local anesthetic administration. No differences were found in the secondary outcomes. Similar results were found in the subgroup analysis.

conclusionRCB approach for brachial plexus anesthesia was similar to ICB approach in terms of time performance. Needle visibility, which represent an important clinical variable, was superior and angle between needle and ultrasound probe was close to 0° in the RCB group. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02913625), registered 26 September 2016.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAnesthetics, LocalBrachial Plexus BlockClavicleFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeedlesTime FactorsUltrasonography, InterventionalUpper ExtremityAnesthetics, LocalAmbulatoryAnatomyBrachial plexusRegional anesthesiaUpper extremity

Identifiers

PMID31656165
PMCPMC6815364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.