ArticlePhilosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences2019
A practical method for estimating coupling functions in complex dynamical systems.
Article in Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inverse problems for dynamic patterns in coupled oscillator networks: when larger networks are simpler.Nature communications · 2026Article
- An extended Hilbert transform method for reconstructing the phase from an oscillatory signal.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Inferring connectivity of an oscillatory network via the phase dynamics reconstruction.Frontiers in network physiology · 2023Review
- Network structure from a characterization of interactions in complex systems.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Coupling functions: dynamical interaction mechanisms in the physical, biological and social sciences.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A foremost challenge in modern network science is the inverse problem of reconstruction (inference) of coupling equations and network topology from the measurements of the network dynamics. Of particular interest are the methods that can operate on real (empirical) data without interfering with the system. One such earlier attempt (Tokuda
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.