Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31656098›Full record

ArticleHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2019

Cerebral Blood Flow Response to Simulated Hypovolemia in Essential Hypertension: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Sandra Neumann, Amy E Burchell, Jonathan C L Rodrigues, Christopher B Lawton, Daniel Burden, Melissa Underhill, Matthew D Kobetić, Zoe H Adams, Jonathan C W Brooks, Angus K Nightingale and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sandra NeumannFrom the Faculty of Life Sciences, School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience (S.N., Z.H.A., J.B., A.K.N., J.P., E.C.H.), University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Amy E BurchellUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom (A.E.B., J.R., C.B.L., D.B., M.U., A.K.N., M.H.).
Jonathan C L RodriguesUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom (A.E.B., J.R., C.B.L., D.B., M.U., A.K.N., M.H.).
Christopher B LawtonUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom (A.E.B., J.R., C.B.L., D.B., M.U., A.K.N., M.H.).
Daniel BurdenUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom (A.E.B., J.R., C.B.L., D.B., M.U., A.K.N., M.H.).
Melissa UnderhillUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom (A.E.B., J.R., C.B.L., D.B., M.U., A.K.N., M.H.).
Matthew D KobetićFaculty of Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School (S.N., M.K.), University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Zoe H AdamsFrom the Faculty of Life Sciences, School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience (S.N., Z.H.A., J.B., A.K.N., J.P., E.C.H.), University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Jonathan C W BrooksFrom the Faculty of Life Sciences, School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience (S.N., Z.H.A., J.B., A.K.N., J.P., E.C.H.), University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Angus K NightingaleFrom the Faculty of Life Sciences, School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience (S.N., Z.H.A., J.B., A.K.N., J.P., E.C.H.), University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Julian F R PatonFrom the Faculty of Life Sciences, School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience (S.N., Z.H.A., J.B., A.K.N., J.P., E.C.H.), University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Mark C K HamiltonUniversity Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom (A.E.B., J.R., C.B.L., D.B., M.U., A.K.N., M.H.).
Emma C HartFrom the Faculty of Life Sciences, School of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience (S.N., Z.H.A., J.B., A.K.N., J.P., E.C.H.), University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Auckland · NZ

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/11/1/28400British Heart Foundation FS/17/38/32935British Heart Foundation RG/12/6/29670Medical Research Council G0700238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertension is associated with raised cerebral vascular resistance and cerebrovascular remodeling. It is currently unclear whether the cerebral circulation can maintain cerebral blood flow (CBF) during reductions in cardiac output (CO) in hypertensive patients thereby avoiding hypoperfusion of the brain. We hypothesized that hypertension would impair the ability to effectively regulate CBF during simulated hypovolemia. In the present study, 39 participants (13 normotensive, 13 controlled, and 13 uncontrolled hypertensives; mean age±SD, 55±10 years) underwent lower body negative pressure (LBNP) at -20, -40, and -50 mmHg to decrease central blood volume. Phase-contrast MR angiography was used to measure flow in the basilar and internal carotid arteries, as well as the ascending aorta. CBF and CO decreased during LBNP (

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsArterial PressureBlood Flow VelocityBlood Pressure DeterminationCase-Control StudiesCerebrovascular CirculationEssential HypertensionFemaleHumansHypovolemiaLongitudinal StudiesLower Body Negative PressureMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle Agedbrain blood flowcerebral blood flowhypertensionLBNPlower body negative pressure

Identifiers

PMID31656098
PMCPMC7069391
OpenAlexW2981569363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.