Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31656048›Full record

SynthesisAddiction (Abingdon, England)2020

Experimental manipulations of behavioral economic demand for addictive commodities: a meta-analysis.

Samuel F Acuff, Michael Amlung, Ashley A Dennhardt, James MacKillop, James G Murphy

Erratum issuedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 65 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Changes in alcohol use during COVID-19 and associations with contextual and individual difference variables: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Gimmie the Gummies: Initial validation of the Edibles Marijuana Purchase Task.Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Reward deprivation is associated with elevated alcohol demand in emerging adults.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samuel F AcuffDepartment of Psychology, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1934-2639
Michael AmlungPeter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University/St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4483-7155
Ashley A DennhardtDepartment of Psychology, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
James MacKillopPeter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University/St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8695-1071
James G MurphyDepartment of Psychology, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.

Funding

The role of religiosity, socioeconomic status and the relationship between behavioral economic variables as mediators of negative alcohol-related consequences in African American emerging adultsR01AA024930 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI MACKILLOP, JAMES, MURPHY, JAMES G. · 2017 to 2021
$1.6M
Integration of Electrophysiological and Behavioral Economic Models of Reward Among Heavy Drinking Emerging AdultsF31AA027140 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MEMPHIS · PI ACUFF, SAMUEL FISHER · 2019 to 2021
$109k
NIAAA NIH HHS F31 AA027140NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA024930
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsReinforcing value, an index of motivation for a drug, is commonly measured using behavioral economic purchase tasks. State-oriented purchase tasks are sensitive to phasic manipulations, but with heterogeneous methods and findings. The aim of this meta-analysis was to characterize the literature examining manipulations of reinforcing value, as measured by purchase tasks and multiple-choice procedures, to inform etiological models and treatment approaches

methodsA random-effects meta-analysis of published findings in peer-reviewed articles. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocol, studies were gathered through searches in PsycINFO and PubMed/MEDLINE (published 22 May 2018). Searches returned 34 unique studies (aggregate sample n = 2402; average sample size = 68.94) yielding 126 effect sizes. Measurements included change (i.e. Cohen's d) in six behavioral economic indices (intensity, breakpoint, O

resultsCue exposure (d range = 0.25-0.44, all Ps < 0.05) and reinforcer magnitude [d = 0.60; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.18, 1.01; P < 0.005] manipulations resulted in significant increases in behavioral economic demand across studies. Stress/negative affect manipulations also resulted in a small, significant increase in O

conclusionsIn behavioral economic studies, purchase tasks and multiple-choice procedures appear to provide indices that are sensitive to manipulations found to influence motivation to consume addictive substances in field experiments.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingBehavior, AddictiveCigarette SmokingConsumer BehaviorCuesHumansMotivationReinforcement, PsychologyAlcohol purchase taskbehavioral economicsbehavioral interventioncravingcue exposuredemandpharmacotherapyreinforcer pathologyreinforcing valuestress

Identifiers

PMID31656048
PMCPMC7156308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.