Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31656026›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2021

Attitudes of Jordanian Oncology Nurses Toward Computerization.

Salam Banihani, Mohammad Al Qadire, Dheif Allah E'leimat

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Salam BanihaniDepartment of Adult Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Al al-Bayt University, Mafraq, Jordan. banihani.salam@yahoo.com.
Mohammad Al QadireFaculty of Nursing, Al Al-Bayt University, P.O.Box 130040, Mafraq, 25113, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7004-6782
Dheif Allah E'leimatAl Al-Bayt University, P.O.Box 130040, Mafraq, 25113, Jordan.
Al al-Bayt University · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of electronic health records is viewed as an effective method to increase safety, efficiency, and effectiveness of nursing care. Nurses are crucial to the successful adoption of electronic health records. The purpose of this study is to assess oncology nurses' attitude toward electronic health records in Jordan. A quantitative cross-sectional survey design was used, in which 271 nurses completed the Nurses' Attitudes Towards Computerization questionnaire. The majority of participants were female (62.4%), with average age of 27.6 (SD = 5.2) years. The mean attitude score was 63.4 (SD = 13.3). Nurses' managers and nurses who received training on the adopted electronic healthcare systems were found to have a more positive attitude toward computer use in clinical practice than other nurses. The findings of this study demonstrated that oncology nurses had a positive attitude toward computerization. Training programs and facilities within an institution should be available to improve nurses' attitudes and enable them to adopt electronic healthcare systems.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelNursesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesComputerizationElectronic health recordsNurses’ attitudePatient safety

Identifiers

PMID31656026
OpenAlexW2981816489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.