Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31656011›Full record

ArticleInfection2020

The "MICE" scoring system in differentiating the identical twins leptospirosis and hantavirus infection.

Selçuk Kaya, Gürdal Yılmaz, Murat Aydın, Firdevs Aksoy, Iftihar Koksal

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Selçuk KayaDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculy of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080, Trabzon, Turkey. eselkaya@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4607-2870
Gürdal YılmazDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculy of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080, Trabzon, Turkey.
Murat AydınDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculy of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080, Trabzon, Turkey.
Firdevs AksoyDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculy of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080, Trabzon, Turkey.
Iftihar KoksalDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Faculy of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, 61080, Trabzon, Turkey.
Karadeniz Technical University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo develop a practical scoring system to assist clinicians in differentiating leptospirosis and hantavirus infections, whose epidemiological, clinical, and laboratory characteristics are literally like identical twins.

methodsThe study population consisted of 162 patients admitted to hospital with a confirmed diagnosis of leptospirosis (LG group, n = 92) and hantavirus infections (HG, group = 70) between January 2000 and January 2019. The two groups were compared in terms of demographic, clinical and laboratory features. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were determined from ROC analysis for findings of significance in the diagnosis of leptospirosis, and a scoring system for diagnosis was developed ("MICE" score). During the development of this scoring system, we were careful to employ parameters that would not affect one another statistically, to reflect the involvement of very different systems (such as the hematological, hepatic, renal, and musculoskeletal systems) due to the multisystemic effect of the disease in the organism, and to ensure that the system should be simple to apply and understand. Accordingly, five parameters, serum WBC, creatinine, creatine kinase, total bilirubin, and C-reactive protein, were employed in the "MICE" scoring system.

resultsThree cut-off values were determined using ROC analysis for the five parameters included in the MICE system. Accordingly, scores of 0, 1, or 2 were given based on the values WBC (/μL): ≤ 7500, 7500-15,000, and > 15,000; total bilirubin (mg/dL): ≤ 3, 3-10, and > 10; CRP (mg/dL): ≤ 5, 5-15, and > 15; creatinine (mg/dL): ≤ 1.5, 1.5-3, and > 3; CK (U/L): ≤ 500, 500-1000, > 1000. AUC was calculated as 0.964 at ROC analysis, while the most noteworthy cut-off point was obtained when MICE score was ≥ 3, exhibiting 93.5% sensitivity, 92.9% specificity, PPV 94.5% and NPV 91.5%. A test score ≥ 3 was regarded as positive. In addition, our patients were evaluated using other current scoring systems in addition to "MICE," and our scoring system exhibited a greater diagnostic power in our subjects.

conclusionsLeptospirosis and hantavirus infections can be accurately predicted by the MICE scoring system. Early diagnosis and rational treatment will also help to lower the mortality rates in these diseases.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresFemaleHantavirus InfectionsHumansLeptospirosisMaleMiddle AgedTurkeyYoung AdultHantavirus infectionIdentical twinsLeptospirosisMICE scoring system

Identifiers

PMID31656011
OpenAlexW2981445581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.