Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31655984›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of hematology2019

Inotuzumab ozogamicin versus standard of care in Asian patients with relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Naohito Fujishima, Toshiki Uchida, Yasushi Onishi, Chul Won Jung, Yeow Tee Goh, Kiyoshi Ando, Ming Chung Wang, Chiho Ono, Miyako Matsumizu, M Luisa Paccagnella and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of hematology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01564784 (AN OPEN-LABEL, RANDOMIZED PHASE 3 STUDY OF INOTUZUMAB OZOGAMICIN COMPARED TO A DEFINED INVESTIGATOR'S CHOICE IN ADULT PATIENTS WITH RELAPSED OR REFRACTORY CD22-POSITIVE ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01564784 phase3completednot on this map

An open-label, randomized phase 3 study of inotuzumab ozogamicin compared to a defined investigator's choice in adult patients with relapsed or refractory cd22-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (all)

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2012 to 2017Enrolled326ConditionsAcute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaArmsinotuzumab ozogamicin, FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine and G-CSF), HIDAC (high dose cytarabine), cytarabine and mitoxantrone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Targeting the lncRNA DUXAP8/miR-29a/Frontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Naohito FujishimaDepartment of Hematology, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Akita University, 1-1-1, Hondo, Akita, 010-8543, Japan. naofuji@doc.med.akita-u.ac.jp.
Toshiki UchidaJapanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Yasushi OnishiTohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Chul Won JungSamsung Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Yeow Tee GohSingapore General Hospital, Bukit Merah, Singapore.
Kiyoshi AndoTokai University Hospital, Isehara, Japan.
Ming Chung WangChang Gung Medical Foundation, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chiho OnoPfizer Japan Inc, Tokyo, Japan.
Miyako MatsumizuPfizer R&D Japan G.K., Tokyo, Japan.
M Luisa PaccagnellaPfizer Inc, Groton, CT, USA.
Barbara SleightPfizer Inc, Groton, CT, USA.
Erik VandendriesPfizer Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Yosuke FujiiPfizer R&D Japan G.K., Tokyo, Japan.
Masayuki HinoOsaka City University, Osaka, Japan.
Pfizer (Japan) · JPPfizer (United States) · USAkita University · JPChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWJapanese Red Cross Nagoya Daini Hospital · JPOsaka City University · JPSamsung Medical Center · KRSingapore General Hospital · SGTohoku University Hospital · JPTokai University Hospital · JP

Funding

Pfizer Not applicable
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inotuzumab ozogamicin (InO) is a targeted treatment for adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). InO was previously studied in INO-VATE, an international, open-label, randomized phase 3 trial comparing InO against standard of care (SoC). In the present subgroup analysis, we evaluated outcomes in the 55 Asian patients who were randomized in INO-VATE (31 InO and 24 SoC). Complete remission (CR) or CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi) was achieved in 22/31 patients treated with InO versus 5/24 treated with SoC. In the InO arm, more of the patients achieving CR/CRi were minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative (17/22 versus 1/5), and more patients proceeded directly to hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (15/31 versus 3/24). Median overall survival for the respective arms was 5.8 versus 3.9 months (hazard ratio 0.67; 97.5% CI 0.28, 1.62). In the safety analysis (n = 51), the most common adverse events were hematologic. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome was reported in five InO patients and one SoC patient. In conclusion, Asian patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell ALL experienced improved efficacy with InO versus SoC, with an efficacy and safety profile consistent with results of the overall INO-VATE population.Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01564784.

Indexed as

AdultAsian PeopleFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHepatic Veno-Occlusive DiseaseHumansInotuzumab OzogamicinMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm, ResidualPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaRemission InductionSalvage TherapyStandard of CareInotuzumab OzogamicinAcute lymphoblastic leukemiaAsianInotuzumab ozogamicinRelapsed/refractory

Identifiers

PMID31655984
OpenAlexW2982028173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.