ArticleJournal of clinical immunology2019
Provider Perceptions of Quality of Life, Neurocognition, Physical Well-being, and Psychosocial Health in Patients with Primary Immunodeficiency/Immune Dysregulation Conditions.
Article in Journal of clinical immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- "I am sick, but that's not all that I am": patient perspectives on psychological adaptation over time to inborn errors of immunity.Journal of community genetics · 2025Article
- Barriers and Opportunities for Patient-Reported Outcome Implementation: A National Pediatrician Survey in the United States.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeBoth pediatric and adult patients with a primary immunodeficiency/immune dysregulation (PID/PIDR) diagnosis report inferior quality of life (QOL) and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as compared with their healthy peers. Recognition of the negative impact on QOL and PROs provides an opportunity for clinicians to intervene with supportive measures. However, provider perceptions of PID/PIDR patients' quality of life, physical well-being, psychosocial health and neurocognition, and access to supportive resources have yet to be systematically evaluated.
methodsWe report specialty providers' perception of the QOL and psychosocial and physical well-being of their pediatric and adult patients with PID/PIDR through the utilization of an online survey assessing QOL and the impact of disease or its associated treatment on their physical well-being, mental health, social relationships, neurocognition, and work/school performance.
resultsClinicians trended towards believing adult PID/PIDR patients had worse overall QOL than children with PID/PIDR. Providers additionally identified their adult patients' QOL to be more deleteriously affected by co-morbidities than their pediatric patients. Clinicians distinguished anxiety and social relationships as the psychosocial aspects most often affected by a complex immunological diagnosis in all patients. Of physical health considerations, energy, rather than mobility or pain, was perceived to be more negatively influenced by PID/PIDR in both adult and pediatric patients.
conclusionsKnowledge of these clinician perceptions can affect communication of findings with patients, as well as ongoing management, and thus, it is important to understand these fully to improve healthcare delivery to, and clinical management of, these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.