Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31655917›Full record

ArticleBrain tumor pathology2020

Giant cell glioblastoma is a distinctive subtype of glioma characterized by vulnerability to DNA damage.

Kaoru Ogawa, Akira Kurose, Akihisa Kamataki, Kenichiro Asano, Kosuke Katayama, Hidekachi Kurotaki

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain tumor pathology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The evolution of pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma: from genesis to molecular alterations and mimics.Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kaoru OgawaDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu, Hirosaki, 036-8562, Japan.
Akira KuroseDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu, Hirosaki, 036-8562, Japan. akurose@hirosaki-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1033-8481
Akihisa KamatakiDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu, Hirosaki, 036-8562, Japan.
Kenichiro AsanoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Kosuke KatayamaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan.
Hidekachi KurotakiDepartment of Pathology, Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital, Aomori, Japan.
Hirosaki University · JPAomori Prefectural Central Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Giant cell glioblastoma (GC-GBM) consists of large cells with pleomorphic nuclei. As a contrast to GC-GBM, we defined monotonous small GBM (MS-GBM) as GBM that consists of small cells with monotonous small nuclei, and compared the DNA damage as well as other pathological features. GC-GBM showed minimal invasion (< 2 mm) and focal sarcomatous areas. TERTp was wild type in GC-GBM but mutant in MS-GBM. OLIG2 expression was significantly higher in MS-GBM (P < 0.01) (77% in MS-GBM and 7% in GC-GBM). GC-GBM showed significantly higher DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) compared with MS-GBM (P < 0.01) (76% in GC-GBM and 15% in MS-GBM). Nearly, all large cells in GC-GBM underwent DSBs. Thus, significant DSBs in GC-GBM might be induced by an innate lesser stemness characteristic and be followed by mitotic slippage, resulting in polyploidization and the large pleomorphic nuclei. We conclude that GC-GBM is a distinctive subtype of glioma characterized by its vulnerability to DNA damage and that wild-type TERTp and lower OLIG2 function might induce this feature. Notably, even large pleomorphic nuclei with severe DSBs demonstrated Ki67 positivity, which alerts pathologists to the interpretation of Ki67 positivity, because cells with large nuclei undergoing severe DSBs cannot be recognized as proliferating cells that contribute to tumor aggressiveness.

Indexed as

DNA DamageGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseBrain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaHumansTumor Cells, CulturedDNA double-strand breaksGiant cell glioblastomaKi67OLIG2TERT

Identifiers

PMID31655917
PMCPMC7028818
OpenAlexW2981644015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.