Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31655915›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2020

A Conjoint Analysis of the Acceptability of Targeted Long-Acting Injectable Antiretroviral Therapy Among Persons Living with HIV in the U.S.

Jane M Simoni, Kenneth Tapia, Sung-Jae Lee, Susan M Graham, Kristin Beima-Sofie, Zahra H Mohamed, Joan Christodoulou, Rodney Ho, Ann C Collier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jane M SimoniDepartment of Psychology, University of Washington, 3909 Stevens Way NE, Campus Box 351525, Seattle, WA, 98195-1525, USA. jsimoni@uw.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8711-1576
Kenneth TapiaDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Sung-Jae LeeDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Susan M GrahamDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kristin Beima-SofieDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Zahra H MohamedDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Joan ChristodoulouDepartment of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Rodney HoDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Ann C CollierDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Kenneth Sherr · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
UCLA Rapid, Relevant, Rigorous Implementation Science HubP30MH058107 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RAPHAEL J LANDOVITZ · 1997 to 2026
$53.5M
Targeted Long-acting Combination Antiretroviral Therapy (TLC-ART)UM1AI120176 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI COLLIER, ANN CORNWALL, HO, RODNEY J.Y. · 2015 to 2019
$15.0M
NextGen Long-acting and targeted combination ART for Children with HIVR33AI149665 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI HO, RODNEY J.Y. · 2022 to 2025
$4.1M
"NextGen Long-acting Platform: Targeted Combination Antiretrovirals"U01AI148055 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BENDER IGNACIO, RACHEL ANN, HO, RODNEY J.Y. · 2019 to 2022
$1.6M
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases AI027757National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases AI120176NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NIAID NIH HHS R33 AI149665NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI148055NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI120176NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH058107
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With long-acting injectable antiretroviral therapy likely to be a treatment option for people living with HIV (PLWH), it is critical to assess its acceptability among potential end-users. Based on formative qualitative work and our own ongoing development of targeted long-acting products in nanosuspension formulations, we created eight hypothetical medication scenarios varying along six dichotomous attributes: administration location (home versus [vs.] clinic), dosing frequency (every 2 weeks vs. 1 week), injections per dose (one vs. two), injection pain (mild vs. moderate), injection site reaction (mild vs. moderate), and effectiveness (better vs. same as pills). PLWH from three outpatient care clinics in Seattle, WA and Riverside, CA rated acceptability (i.e., willingness to try each hypothetical medication) from 0 (very unlikely) to 100 (very likely). In conjoint analyses, we examined level and correlates of acceptability, the impact of each attribute on overall acceptability, and moderators of this effect. Participants (median age 52 years; 71% male, 34% White, 36% Black/African American, 20% Hispanic) rated acceptability of the 8 scenarios from 47.8 (standard deviation [SD] = 37.0) to 68.8 (SD = 34.1), with effectiveness (impact score = 7.3, SD = 18.7, p = 0.005) and dosing frequency (impact score = 5.7, SD = 19.6, p = 0.034) the only attributes with a significant impact on acceptability. There were no statistically significant differences in overall acceptability according to any participant socio-demographic or other characteristic; however, gender, education, employment status, and experience with and hatred/avoidance of injections moderated some effects. Overall acceptability for targeted long-acting antiretroviral treatment as proposed was modest, with superior effectiveness and lower dosing frequency most impactful on acceptability. Future acceptability research should continue to evaluate specific products in development with a full range of conjoint analytic and other techniques.

Indexed as

Anti-Retroviral AgentsHIV InfectionsPatient Acceptance of Health CareText MessagingBlack or African AmericanDelayed-Action PreparationsFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnti-Retroviral AgentsDelayed-Action PreparationsAcceptabilityConjoint analysisEnd-user preferencesHIV/AIDSHIV treatmentTargeted long-acting injectable ART

Identifiers

PMID31655915
PMCPMC7085450

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.