Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31655885›Full record

ReviewInternational orthopaedics2020

Methods of intra- and post-operative determination of the position of the tibial component during total knee replacement.

Roman Popescu, Emil G Haritinian, Stefan Cristea

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International orthopaedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Roman PopescuCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Rectorate - Dionisie Lupu Street, no. 37, District 1, 020021, Bucharest, Romania.
Emil G HaritinianCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Rectorate - Dionisie Lupu Street, no. 37, District 1, 020021, Bucharest, Romania. haritinian@yahoo.com.
Stefan CristeaCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Rectorate - Dionisie Lupu Street, no. 37, District 1, 020021, Bucharest, Romania. drstefancristea@yahoo.com.
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROClinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest · RO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aim of the studyTo identify the most reliable anatomical landmarks and imaging techniques for assessing the rotation of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

methodsAn extensive literature review (from January 2016 to March 2019) was performed. We included studies about primary TKA with details concerning the anatomical landmarks used for implanting the tibial component and also imaging studies assessing tibial component rotation. The final selection comprises only thirty-five articles consistent with the inclusion criteria.

resultsExtra-articular landmarks are not always reliable (even though the tibial tubercle is one of the most popular extra-articular landmarks used to assess the rotation of the tibial component), mainly because they vary and can lead to malrotation of the tibial component. Akagi's line (an intra-articular landmark) is considered to be the most reliable and easy to find during surgery and likewise is not affected by articular deformities. The anterior tibial cortex (intra-articular landmark) also proved to be accurate and reliable with the main advantage being that is palpable after tibial resection. Radiography provides a good and inexpensive option for imaging, but it is insufficient. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used in some cases but not routinely for assessing TKA components or their orientation. Computed tomography (CT), used together with a well-defined protocol (Berger's method being the preferred choice), remains the "gold standard" for evaluating the rotation of the tibial component after TKA.

conclusionCurrently, the most accurate and reliable anatomical landmarks are represented by Akagi's line and the anterior cortex of the tibia. Post-operatively, through CT and well-established protocols, the rotation of the tibial component can be accurately determined.

Indexed as

Knee ProsthesisArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeBone MalalignmentHumansIntraoperative PeriodKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingPerioperative CarePostoperative PeriodRotationTibiaTomography, X-Ray ComputedAkagi’s lineAnatomical landmark for tibial component rotationAnterior tibial cortexImaging technique in TKARotation of the tibial componentTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID31655885
OpenAlexW2981353007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.