Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31655871›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2020

Pigtail catheters versus traditional chest drains for pneumothorax treatment in two NICUs.

Raffaella Panza, Giorgia Prontera, Kevin Nicholas Ives, Sanja Zivanovic, Charles C Roehr, Michele Quercia, Federico Schettini, Francesco Paolo Bianchi, Silvio Tafuri, Antonio Di Mauro and 1 more

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. What is the best way to secure a chest drain? A scoping review.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Pneumothorax in a term newborn.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Raffaella PanzaDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Section, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Policlinico Hospital - Piazza Giulio Cesare n. 11, 70124, Bari, Italy. raffaella.panza@uniba.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2489-9500
Giorgia PronteraDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Section, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Policlinico Hospital - Piazza Giulio Cesare n. 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Kevin Nicholas IvesNewborn Services, John Radcliffe Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
Sanja ZivanovicNewborn Services, John Radcliffe Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
Charles C RoehrNewborn Services, John Radcliffe Hospital, NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK.
Michele QuerciaDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Section, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Policlinico Hospital - Piazza Giulio Cesare n. 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Federico SchettiniDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Section, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Policlinico Hospital - Piazza Giulio Cesare n. 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Francesco Paolo BianchiDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Section of Hygiene, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Silvio TafuriDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Section of Hygiene, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy.
Antonio Di MauroDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Section, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Policlinico Hospital - Piazza Giulio Cesare n. 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Nicola LaforgiaDepartment of Biomedical Science and Human Oncology, Neonatology and Neonatal Intensive Care Section, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Policlinico Hospital - Piazza Giulio Cesare n. 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
University of Bari Aldo Moro · ITJohn Radcliffe Hospital · GB

Funding

Mellin SpA 01Mellin SpA 02Universita degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro Global Thesis
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pneumothorax in newborns can be life-threatening. The traditional treatment of pneumothorax is chest drain placement. Recently, modified pigtail catheter has been proposed as a less traumatic approach despite limited experience in infants. To compare the effectiveness and safety of pigtail catheters versus traditional straight chest drains in term and preterm infants with pneumothorax, in two tertiary neonatal units: Policlinico Hospital in Bari, IT and John Radcliffe Hospital in Oxford, UK. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 47 newborns with pneumothorax admitted to the two units between October 2009 and June 2017, and treated with either pigtail catheters or straight chest drains. Three newborns (6.7%) were excluded from the study because they were treated with both types of drains. The remaining 44 neonates were included in the analysis. Overall, 56.8% (n = 25/44) of pneumothoraces were drained with pigtail catheters and 43.2% (n = 19/44) with straight drains. No differences in gestational age and birth weight were found. The success rate, defined as complete radiological resolution of the pneumothorax after drainage, was significantly higher in the pigtail group (96.0% versus 73.7%; p < 0.05). Days of drainage, length of hospital stay and duration of respiratory support were not significantly different. Subcutaneous emphysema and drain dislodgement/malfunction occurred only in the straight drain group (0.0% versus 11.1%; p = 0.181). No significant differences in mortality between the two groups were found (28.0% pigtail group versus 26.3% straight drain group; p > 0.05).Conclusion: Pigtail catheters are a safe and effective alternative to traditional chest drains for infants with pneumothorax. What is Known:• Air leaks in newborns can represent an emergency, especially among preterms;• The first treatment in a life-threatening pneumothorax is thoracentesis with needle aspiration or placement of a chest drain.What is New:• Pigtail catheter have been described as an alternative to traditional chest drains;• Pigtail catheters are a safe and effective alternative to traditional chest drains for infants with pneumothorax.

Indexed as

Chest TubesDrainageFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care, NeonatalIntensive Care Units, NeonatalMalePneumothoraxRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeChest drainNeonatePigtail catheterPneumothorax

Identifiers

PMID31655871
OpenAlexW2981477032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.