ReviewPrimary care2019
The Business Case for Population Health Management.
Review in Primary care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health care leaders' perspectives on the business impact of mobile health clinics.International journal for equity in health · 2023Article
- Applying embedded program evaluation for care delivery transformation: An analysis of a home-based urgent care program.Health science reports · 2022Article
- Volatility and Persistence of Value-Based Purchasing Adjustments: A Challenge to Integrating Population Health and Community Benefit Into Business Operations.Frontiers in public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
American health care is shifting from a fixed-cost, fee-for-service payment model to value-based payment, in which providers including physicians and hospitals increasingly face incentives to reduce the total cost of care and meet specific quality benchmarks. Leaders of organizations that pay for health care and employers have encouraged this shift in response to substantial increases in health care costs and generally mediocre health outcomes compared with other countries. Here, we make the case that although the pace and details of such payment reforms are uncertain, these underlying structural economic challenges make a transition to some sort of value-based care inevitable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.