Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31655571›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2019

Community-based aftercare following an emergency department presentation for attempted suicide or high risk for suicide: study protocol for a non-randomised controlled trial.

Vida V Bliokas, Alex R Hains, Jonathan A Allan, Luise Lago, Rebecca Sng

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vida V BliokasUniversity of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia. vida@uow.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3573-6443
Alex R HainsIllawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Jonathan A AllanUniversity of Wollongong, Northfields Avenue, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Luise LagoCentre for Health Research Illawarra Shoalhaven Population, University of Wollongong, Building 234, Innovation Campus, Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia.
Rebecca SngGrand Pacific Health, 336 Keira Street, Wollongong, NSW, 2500, Australia.
University of Wollongong · AUNew South Wales Department of Primary Industries · AU

Funding

Illawarra Shoalhaven Suicide Prevention Collaborative -University of Wollongong -
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuicide is a major public health issue worldwide. Those who have made a recent suicide attempt are at high risk for dying by suicide in the future, particularly during the period immediately following departure from a hospital emergency department. As such the transition from hospital-based care to the community is an important area of focus in the attempt to reduce suicide rates. There is a need for evaluation studies to test the effectiveness of interventions directed to this stage (termed 'aftercare' interventions).

methodsA controlled non-randomised two group (intervention vs treatment-as-usual control) design, using an intention-to-treat model, will evaluate the effectiveness of a suicide prevention aftercare intervention providing follow-up after presentations to a hospital emergency department as a result of a suicide attempt or high risk for suicide. The intervention is a community-based service, utilising two meetings with a mental health clinician and follow-up contacts by peer workers via a combination of face-to-face and telephone for four weeks, with the option of extension to 12 weeks. Seventy-five participants of the intervention service will be recruited to the study and compared to 1265 treatment-as-usual controls. The primary hypotheses are that over 12 months, those who participate in the aftercare follow-up intervention are less likely than controls to present to a hospital emergency department for a repeat suicide attempt or because of high risk for suicide, will have fewer re-presentations during this period and will have lower all-cause mortality. As a secondary aim, the impact of the intervention on suicide risk factors for those who participate in the service will be evaluated using pre- and post-intervention repeated measures of depression, anxiety, stress, hopelessness, belongingness, burdensomeness, and psychological distress. Enrolments into the study commenced on 1 November 2017 and are anticipated to cease in November 2019. DISCUSSION: The study aims to contribute to the understanding of effective interventions for individuals who have presented to a hospital emergency department as a result of a suicide attempt or at high risk for suicide and provide evidence in relation to interventions that incorporate peer-workers.

trial registrationACTRN12618001701213 . Registered on 16 October 2018. Retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

AftercareCommunity Health ServicesSuicide, AttemptedSuicide PreventionAdolescentAdultEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleNon-Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk AssessmentAftercarePeer workerSuicide prevention

Identifiers

PMID31655571
PMCPMC6815378
OpenAlexW2982057113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.