ArticleHearing research2019
Recovery from tympanic membrane perforation: Effects on membrane thickness, auditory thresholds, and middle ear transmission.
Article in Hearing research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative Study of Tympanic Membrane Regeneration Therapy for Chronic Otitis Media.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Bilateral tympanic membrane perforation during bronchoscopy in an intensive care unit patient: a case report.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Fibrous Biomaterial Scaffold for Tympanic Membrane Repair: Microarchitectural Engineering and Structure Function Performance.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Imaging the Ear Anatomy and Function Using Optical Coherence Tomography Vibrometry.Seminars in hearing · 2024Review
- Analysis of cognitive framework and biomedical translation of tissue engineering in otolaryngology.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Evaluation of acoustic changes in and the healing outcomes of rat eardrums with pars tensa and pars flaccida perforations.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2022Article
- Experimental animal models of drug-induced sensorineural hearing loss: a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Review
- Assessment of auditory and vestibular damage in a mouse model after single and triple blast exposures.Hearing research · 2021Article
- Forward and Reverse Middle Ear Transmission in Gerbil with a Normal or Spontaneously Healed Tympanic Membrane.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sounds delivered to the ear move the tympanic membrane (TM), which drives the middle-ear (ME) ossicles and transfers the acoustic energy to the cochlea. Perforations of the TM result in hearing loss because of less efficient sound conduction through the ME. The patterns of TM motions, and thus ME sound transmission, vary with frequency and depend on many factors, including the TM thickness. In this study, we measured TM thickness, auditory brainstem responses (ABR), and ME transmission immediately following a controlled pars tensa perforation and after 4 weeks of spontaneous recovery in a gerbil model. It is found that after recovery, the hearing thresholds showed a sloping pattern across frequencies: almost back to normal levels at frequencies between 2 and 8 kHz, sloping loss in the low (<2 kHz) and mid-frequency (8-30 kHz) range, and little restoration at frequencies above 30 kHz. This pattern was confirmed by the measured ME pressure gains. The thickness of the healed TM did not return to normal but was 2-3 times thicker over a significant portion of the membrane. The increased thickness was not limited to the perforated area but expanded into intact regions adjacent to the perforation, which led to an increased thickness in general. Combined, these results suggest that TM thickness is an important factor in determining its vibration patterns and efficiency to transfer sounds to the ossicles and thus influencing ME sound transmission, especially for high-frequency sounds. The results provided both structural and functional observations to explain the conductive hearing loss seen in patients with abnormal TMs, e.g., caused by otitis media, spontaneously healed post-perforation, or repaired via tympanoplasty in the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.