Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31655347›Full record

ArticleHearing research2019

Recovery from tympanic membrane perforation: Effects on membrane thickness, auditory thresholds, and middle ear transmission.

Lingling Cai, Glenna Stomackin, Nicholas M Perez, Xiaohui Lin, Timothy T Jung, Wei Dong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lingling CaiVA Loma Linda Healthcare System, Loma Linda, CA, 92357, USA; Department of Radiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai JiaoTong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Glenna StomackinVA Loma Linda Healthcare System, Loma Linda, CA, 92357, USA.
Nicholas M PerezVA Loma Linda Healthcare System, Loma Linda, CA, 92357, USA; School of Computer Science and Engineering, California State University San Bernardino, San Bernardino, CA, 92407, USA.
Xiaohui LinVA Loma Linda Healthcare System, Loma Linda, CA, 92357, USA.
Timothy T JungVA Loma Linda Healthcare System, Loma Linda, CA, 92357, USA; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, 92350, USA.
Wei DongVA Loma Linda Healthcare System, Loma Linda, CA, 92357, USA; Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, 92350, USA. Electronic address: Wei.dong@va.gov.

Funding

Exploring otoacoustic emissions with intracochlear pressure and motion measuremenR01DC011506 · NIDCD · LOMA LINDA VETERANS ASSN RESEARCH & EDUC · PI DONG, WEI · 2012 to 2016
$1.1M
Improving Restoration of Middle-Ear Function Following Blast Related InjuriesI01RX002296 · VA · VA LOMA LINDA HEALTHCARE SYSTEM · PI DONG, WEI · 2017 to 2024
–
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011506RRD VA I01 RX002296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sounds delivered to the ear move the tympanic membrane (TM), which drives the middle-ear (ME) ossicles and transfers the acoustic energy to the cochlea. Perforations of the TM result in hearing loss because of less efficient sound conduction through the ME. The patterns of TM motions, and thus ME sound transmission, vary with frequency and depend on many factors, including the TM thickness. In this study, we measured TM thickness, auditory brainstem responses (ABR), and ME transmission immediately following a controlled pars tensa perforation and after 4 weeks of spontaneous recovery in a gerbil model. It is found that after recovery, the hearing thresholds showed a sloping pattern across frequencies: almost back to normal levels at frequencies between 2 and 8 kHz, sloping loss in the low (<2 kHz) and mid-frequency (8-30 kHz) range, and little restoration at frequencies above 30 kHz. This pattern was confirmed by the measured ME pressure gains. The thickness of the healed TM did not return to normal but was 2-3 times thicker over a significant portion of the membrane. The increased thickness was not limited to the perforated area but expanded into intact regions adjacent to the perforation, which led to an increased thickness in general. Combined, these results suggest that TM thickness is an important factor in determining its vibration patterns and efficiency to transfer sounds to the ossicles and thus influencing ME sound transmission, especially for high-frequency sounds. The results provided both structural and functional observations to explain the conductive hearing loss seen in patients with abnormal TMs, e.g., caused by otitis media, spontaneously healed post-perforation, or repaired via tympanoplasty in the clinic.

Indexed as

Auditory ThresholdHearingAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalEar, MiddleEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemGerbillinaeMotionPressureRecovery of FunctionSoundTympanic MembraneTympanic Membrane PerforationWound HealingHealed tympanic-membrane post-perforationHearingMiddle-ear pressure gainMiddle-ear sound transmissionOptical coherence tomographyTympanic-membrane thickness

Identifiers

PMID31655347
PMCPMC6961563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.