ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2019
Ensembles of natural language processing systems for portable phenotyping solutions.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Natural language processing algorithms for mapping clinical text fragments onto ontology concepts: a systematic review and recommendations for future studies.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2020Pooled it
- Generative Models and Sentence Transformers for the Recognition and Normalization of Continuous and Discontinuous Phenotype Mentions: Model Development and Evaluation.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
- Review
- Evaluation of the portability of computable phenotypes with natural language processing in the eMERGE network.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Phenotyping in clinical text with unsupervised numerical reasoning for patient stratification.Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Clinical utility of automatic phenotype annotation in unstructured clinical notes: intensive care unit use.BMJ health & care informatics · 2022Article
- An ensemble approach for healthcare application and diagnosis using natural language processing.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2022Article
- Evaluation of phenotype-driven gene prioritization methods for Mendelian diseases.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Feasibility of capturing real-world data from health information technology systems at multiple centers to assess cardiac ablation device outcomes: A fit-for-purpose informatics analysis report.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021Article
- Using computable knowledge mined from the literature to elucidate confounders for EHR-based pharmacovigilance.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2021Article
- Deep phenotyping: Embracing complexity and temporality-Towards scalability, portability, and interoperability.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2020Article
- CQL4NLP: Development and Integration of FHIR NLP Extensions in Clinical Quality Language for EHR-driven Phenotyping.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational ScienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundManually curating standardized phenotypic concepts such as Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) terms from narrative text in electronic health records (EHRs) is time consuming and error prone. Natural language processing (NLP) techniques can facilitate automated phenotype extraction and thus improve the efficiency of curating clinical phenotypes from clinical texts. While individual NLP systems can perform well for a single cohort, an ensemble-based method might shed light on increasing the portability of NLP pipelines across different cohorts.
methodsWe compared four NLP systems, MetaMapLite, MedLEE, ClinPhen and cTAKES, and four ensemble techniques, including intersection, union, majority-voting and machine learning, for extracting generic phenotypic concepts. We addressed two important research questions regarding automated phenotype recognition. First, we evaluated the performance of different approaches in identifying generic phenotypic concepts. Second, we compared the performance of different methods to identify patient-specific phenotypic concepts. To better quantify the effects caused by concept granularity differences on performance, we developed a novel evaluation metric that considered concept hierarchies and frequencies. Each of the approaches was evaluated on a gold standard set of clinical documents annotated by clinical experts. One dataset containing 1,609 concepts derived from 50 clinical notes from two different institutions was used in both evaluations, and an additional dataset of 608 concepts derived from 50 case report abstracts obtained from PubMed was used for evaluation of identifying generic phenotypic concepts only.
resultsFor generic phenotypic concept recognition, the top three performers in the NYP/CUIMC dataset are union ensemble (F
conclusionsOur study demonstrates that ensembles of natural language processing can improve both generic phenotypic concept recognition and patient specific phenotypic concept identification over individual systems. Among the individual NLP systems, each individual system performed best when they were applied in the dataset that they were primary designed for. However, combining multiple NLP systems to create an ensemble can generally improve the performance. Specifically, the ensemble can increase the results reproducibility across different cohorts and tasks, and thus provide a more portable phenotyping solution compared to individual NLP systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.