Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31655138›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2020

Joint B

Muhammad Usman, Lebina Kakkar, Antonis Matakos, Alex Kirkham, Simon Arridge, David Atkinson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Muhammad UsmanUniversity College London, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: m.usman@ucl.ac.uk.
Lebina KakkarUniversity College London, London, United Kingdom.
Antonis MatakosCanon Medical Research, Cleveland, OH, United States.
Alex KirkhamUniversity College Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Simon ArridgeUniversity College London, London, United Kingdom.
David AtkinsonUniversity College London, London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBCanon (United States) · USUniversity College Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 21099Cancer Research UK A21099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In prostate Diffusion Weighted MRI, differences in susceptibility values exist at the interface between the prostate and rectal-air. This can result in off-resonance magnetic field leading to geometric distortions including signal stretching and signal pile-up in the reconstructed images. Using a set of EPI data acquired with blip-up and blip-down phase encoding gradient directions, model based reconstruction has recently been proposed that can correct these distortions by using a B

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingEcho-Planar ImagingAgedAged, 80 and overAirAlgorithmsArtifactsFourier AnalysisHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedProstateVibrationB(0) mappingDiffusionGeometric distortionProstate MRI

Identifiers

PMID31655138
PMCPMC6837878
OpenAlexW2981516758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.