Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31655096›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2020

A time-based intervention to treat impulsivity in male and female rats.

Kelsey Panfil, Carrie Bailey, Ian Davis, Anne Mains, Kimberly Kirkpatrick

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Premature release of action sequences in adolescent male rats.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Using sign tracking to experimentally increase self-control in rats.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Selective chemogenetic inactivation of corticoaccumbal projections disrupts trait choice impulsivity.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kelsey PanfilDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, United States. Electronic address: kpanfil@ksu.edu.
Carrie BaileyDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, United States; University of Missouri, KS, United States.
Ian DavisDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, 20742, United States.
Anne MainsDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, United States.
Kimberly KirkpatrickDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, 66506, United States.

Funding

The role of prestimulus oscillatory brain dynamics in auditory memoryP20GM113109 · NIGMS · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Maria Magdalena Diehl · 2017 to 2026
$24.1M
Timing, Reward Processing and choiceR01MH085739 · NIMH · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, TRAVIS R, VONDER HAAR, COLE · 2010 to 2025
$4.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM113109NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085739
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Time-based interventions have emerged as promising treatments for disorders associated with impulsivity. These interventions can be implemented to test their efficacy in preventing or treating impulsive choice in animal models of diseases related to impulsivity such as drug abuse. Impulsive choice is typically defined as choosing a smaller-sooner (SS) reward over a larger-later (LL) reward when the LL is relatively more optimal. Previous research has shown that these interventions promote LL choices in males and females, but sex differences have not been assessed. Because sex differences can complicate the application of therapies, it is critical to compare the effects of the intervention in males and females. The intervention group received exposure to 10-s and 30-s interval schedules, and the control rats received no delay to reward. Different impulsive choice tasks were used to assess the intervention efficacy across the two experiments. Following the intervention, reductions in impulsive choice were found in male and female rats, but the degree of improvement was inconsistent across sex and task. Bayesian analyses that combined the results revealed robust evidence of an overall intervention effect with the intervention group showing greater self-control, but there was no evidence for the intervention affecting males and females differently. Taken together, these results suggest that time-based interventions are effective tools to treat impulsivity in both males and females and offer promising translational capability to humans.

Indexed as

RewardSex CharacteristicsAnimalsBayes TheoremBehavior, AnimalChoice BehaviorDelay DiscountingFemaleImpulsive BehaviorMaleRandom AllocationRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySelf-ControlBayesianFemaleImpulsive choiceInterventionRat

Identifiers

PMID31655096
PMCPMC6917889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.