Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31654911›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in microbiology2019

Harnessing the microbiome to control plant parasitic weeds.

Raul Masteling, Lorenzo Lombard, Wietse de Boer, Jos M Raaijmakers, Francisco Dini-Andreote

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Fungal systematics and evolution · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Phytotoxic compounds from endophytic fungi.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Characterization of an endophytic bacterium (Plant signaling & behavior · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Populations of the Parasitic PlantFrontiers in plant science · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Raul MastelingDepartment of Microbial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, The Netherlands; Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: r.masteling@nioo.knaw.nl.
Lorenzo LombardWesterdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Wietse de BoerDepartment of Microbial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, The Netherlands; Chair Group Soil Biology, Wageningen University and Research (WUR), Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Jos M RaaijmakersDepartment of Microbial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, The Netherlands; Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands. Electronic address: j.raaijmakers@nioo.knaw.nl.
Francisco Dini-AndreoteDepartment of Microbial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), Wageningen, The Netherlands; Department of Plant Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA; Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbiomes can significantly expand the genomic potential of plants, contributing to nutrient acquisition, plant growth promotion and tolerance to (a)biotic stresses. Among biotic stressors, root parasitic weeds (RPWs), mainly of the genera Orobanche, Phelipanche and Striga, are major yield-limiting factors of a wide range of staple crops, particularly in developing countries. Here, we provide a conceptual synthesis of putative mechanisms by which soil and plant microbiomes could be harnessed to control RPWs. These mechanisms are partitioned in direct and indirect modes of action and discussed in the context of past and present studies on microbe-mediated suppression of RPWs. Specific emphasis is given to the large but yet unexplored potential of root-associated microorganisms to interfere with the chemical signalling cascade between the host plant and the RPWs. We further provide concepts and ideas for future research directions and prospective designs of novel control strategies.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSoil MicrobiologyCrops, AgriculturalHost Microbial InteractionsMicrobial InteractionsPlant DiseasesPlant RootsPlant WeedsSignal Transduction

Identifiers

PMID31654911
PMCPMC6906922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.