Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31654774›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2020

Evaluation of a polyurethane-reinforced hydrogel patch in a rat right ventricle wall replacement model.

Ze-Wei Tao, Siliang Wu, Elizabeth M Cosgriff-Hernandez, Jeffrey G Jacot

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Biomimetic Polyurethanes in Tissue Engineering.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. AnMaterials today. Communications · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ze-Wei TaoDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12705 E Montview Blvd, Suite 100, Aurora 80045, CO, USA.
Siliang WuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Elizabeth M Cosgriff-HernandezDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Jeffrey G JacotDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12705 E Montview Blvd, Suite 100, Aurora 80045, CO, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA. Electronic address: jeffrey.jacot@cuanschutz.edu.
The University of Texas at Austin · USChildren's Hospital Colorado · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · US

Funding

PRE-VASCULARIZED AND DEGRADABLE PATCHES FOR CORRECTION OF CONGENITAL HEART DEFECTSR01HL130436 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI JACOT, JEFFREY G · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL130436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congenital heart defects affect about 1% births in the United States. Many of the defects are treated with surgically implanted patches made from inactive materials or fixed pericardium that do not grow with the patients, leading to an increased risk of arrhythmia, sudden cardiac death, and heart failure. This study investigated an angiogenic poly(ethylene glycol) fibrin-based hydrogel reinforced with an electrospun biodegradable poly(ether ester urethane) urea (BPUR) mesh layer that was designed to encourage cell invasion, angiogenesis, and regenerative remodeling in the repair of an artificial defect created onto the rat right ventricle wall. Electrocardiogram signals were analyzed, heart function was measured, and fibrosis, macrophage infiltration, muscularization, vascularization, and defect size were evaluated at 4- and 8-weeks post-surgery. Compared with rats with fixed pericardium patches, rats with BPUR-reinforced hydrogel patches had fewer arrhythmias and greater right ventricular ejection fraction and cardiac output, as well as greater left ventricular ejection fraction, fractional shorting, stroke work and cardiac output. Histology and immunofluorescence staining showed less fibrosis and less patch material remaining in rats with BPUR-reinforced hydrogel patches at 4- and 8-weeks. Rats with BPUR-reinforced hydrogel patches also had a greater volume of granular tissue, a greater volume of muscularized tissue, more blood vessels, and a greater number of leukocytes, pan-macrophages, and M2 macrophages at 8 weeks. Overall, this study demonstrated that the engineered BPUR-reinforced hydrogel patch initiated greater regenerative vascular and muscular remodeling with a limited fibrotic response, resulting in fewer incidences of arrhythmia and improved heart function compared with fixed pericardium patches when applied to heal the defects created on the rat right ventricle wall. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The study tested a polyurethane-reinforced hydrogel patch in a rat right ventricle wall replacement model. Compared with fixed pericardium patches, these reinforced hydrogel patches initiated greater regenerative vascular and muscular remodeling with a reduced fibrotic response, resulting in fewer incidences of arrhythmia and improved heart function at 4- and 8-weeks post surgery. Overall, the new BPUR-reinforced hydrogel patches resulted in better heart function when replacing contractile myocardium than fixed pericardium patches.

Indexed as

Cardiac OutputElectrocardiographyHeart-Assist DevicesVentricular Function, LeftAnimalsHeart VentriclesHydrogelsMaleMyocardiumPolyurethanesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyVentricular RemodelingHydrogelsPolyurethanesCardiac tissue engineeringCongenital heart defectsFibrin gelPoly(ether ester urethane) ureaPoly(ethylene glycol)Surgical correction

Identifiers

PMID31654774
PMCPMC6960327
OpenAlexW2981766115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.